Looking at BTC's trend, this bull market is actually not fundamentally different from previous cycles in terms of structure — graphically, it aligns perfectly, with no stages missing.
But there's an interesting point here. Compared to the previous highs and lows, the market is now 12 to 18 months behind schedule. Why? Essentially, macro factors are at play — liquidity, policy expectations, institutional entry pace — all of which have extended the timeline.
The first phase, which should have been quick in accumulation and acceleration, has been dragged into a marathon this time. So it's not that the cycle has been broken, but that it has been forcibly prolonged.
From the data, a standard cycle lasts about 4 years. This time? It’s expected to take 5 to 5.5 years to complete. Some people are still debating whether this time is different. Actually, there's no need. The market always repeats its story; it's just that each script has a different length. No two cycles are exactly the same, just like no two leaves are identical.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTDreamer
· 16h ago
It was stretched artificially, this is ridiculous. Should have taken the car this morning.
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHunter
· 2025-12-31 16:52
Basically, it's just extended, nothing new.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 2025-12-31 16:51
Bro, this analysis is indeed insightful. Falling behind by more than a year, but it still needs to go up when it's time.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretful
· 2025-12-31 16:45
Just stretch it out if you want, I'm already caught in it anyway.
There's no way around it, so I might as well wait for 5.5 years, I can't escape anyway.
Macroeconomic factors? Nice words, but isn't it just the big players shaking out the weak?
Marathon... I'm afraid I'll run out of stamina halfway through.
Cycle theory is back again, every time claiming to be aligned, but the results are never the same.
This logic... if it could predict, we wouldn't keep hitting the same pitfalls.
Take it slow if you must, consider it as a regular investment practice.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 2025-12-31 16:42
Basically, it's just extending the cycle, nothing new.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 2025-12-31 16:35
Damn it, it's the same old story again. Has the bull market progress been delayed by almost two years? Why do I feel like my funds have long since fallen behind the coin price?
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 2025-12-31 16:29
It was forcibly extended, which is really a bit annoying. Do I still have to wait another year and a half?
Looking at BTC's trend, this bull market is actually not fundamentally different from previous cycles in terms of structure — graphically, it aligns perfectly, with no stages missing.
But there's an interesting point here. Compared to the previous highs and lows, the market is now 12 to 18 months behind schedule. Why? Essentially, macro factors are at play — liquidity, policy expectations, institutional entry pace — all of which have extended the timeline.
The first phase, which should have been quick in accumulation and acceleration, has been dragged into a marathon this time. So it's not that the cycle has been broken, but that it has been forcibly prolonged.
From the data, a standard cycle lasts about 4 years. This time? It’s expected to take 5 to 5.5 years to complete. Some people are still debating whether this time is different. Actually, there's no need. The market always repeats its story; it's just that each script has a different length. No two cycles are exactly the same, just like no two leaves are identical.