2025-12-31 16:27:18

A leading exchange recently responded comprehensively to a phishing attack caused by supply chain tampering — affected users' assets have been fully compensated or resolved through debt schemes.

More importantly, they initiated legal proceedings against the hackers and their associated accounts, cooperating with law enforcement to freeze relevant assets and advance subsequent disposal. This combined approach demonstrates the exchange's stance on security response: not only to quickly compensate users for losses but also to hold hackers accountable from the source. In such emergency security incidents, the ability to address both aspects is a key indicator of the platform's governance capability.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 4h ago

Compensation was quite quick, but I'm worried that the follow-up to追黑客 (追踪黑客) will be delayed again. Did they really追到黑客 (追踪到黑客)? It feels like these kinds of news are always like this. The attitude is good, but the key is how it will be implemented later; don't let it end in failure again. But it's still better than some exchanges passing the buck, thumbs up. Are the hacker's funds frozen? Or did they跑路 again? That's the real issue.

View OriginalReply0

FlatTax

· 8h ago

Really, this time it's finally not passing the buck? Compensation in place and accountability followed through, it's rare. A leading exchange truly takes security seriously, I give this operation a thumbs up. No matter how severe the phishing attack, someone dares to pursue it; freezing assets has been done many times. By the way, how do other platforms view this kind of incident... Now those affected brothers should be able to breathe a sigh of relief. Compensation plus accountability is indeed the right approach.

View OriginalReply0

VCsSuckMyLiquidity

· 2025-12-31 16:57

They say the compensation is fast enough, but I still want to see if they really catch the hacker. --- Taking a dual approach sounds good, but I'm worried it will be all bark and no bite. --- The supply chain really needs to be taken seriously, or who would dare to use it? --- Freezing assets in cooperation with law enforcement? This time they are serious. --- The problem is, can hacker assets really be recovered? I always feel like these two amounts are ultimately a waste. --- The speed is okay, let's see how the subsequent execution goes. --- Full compensation plus prosecution, this stance is definitely much stronger than some exchanges. --- Phishing is hard to prevent entirely; the key is to be careful oneself.

View OriginalReply0

ShadowStaker

· 2025-12-31 16:53

honestly the supply chain compromise angle is wild... but let's see if they actually follow through on the prosecution bit or if it's just pr theater like usual

Reply0

OptionWhisperer

· 2025-12-31 16:53

Compensation is quick, and追黑客, this is the proper way to do it. --- Double approach, ruthless, with this attitude, we should learn. --- Wait, supply chain has been tampered with? How outrageous does it have to be? --- Both phishing and hackers, really unstoppable. --- Fast compensation plus追诉, this exchange still has some conscience. --- Huh, no scolding this time? Looks like some people still recognize doing the right thing. --- The compensation plan is straightforward, at least not passing the buck. --- I respect追责 from the source; unlike some platforms that play deaf and mute. --- Governance ability is judged in this moment; good reputation is maintained, poor performance is deadly. --- How can phishing attacks still happen... the protection really can't keep up. --- The hacker has been追诉, now it depends on whether law enforcement gives support. --- This time handled gracefully, much better than the scapegoating by a certain institution last time.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 2025-12-31 16:39

Speaking of this move, it does have some substance—compensation combined with追诉 (pursuit of prosecution) on both fronts. However, I still want to know when those hacker assets will truly flow into the victims' wallets.

View OriginalReply0