2025-12-31 16:30:17

A game-changer for your 2026 strategy:

Stop thinking about crypto markets in yearly blocks. Forget the calendar.

Instead, break your goals into Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 2026. Each quarter is its own battleground.

Why? Because market cycles don't care about calendar years. Bitcoin halvings, altseason rotations, regulatory shifts—they operate on their own rhythm, not on January 1st.

Narrow your focus to the next 90 days. Set concrete targets: portfolio rebalancing, position sizing, research milestones, whatever applies to your strategy.

You'll execute faster, adapt quicker to market conditions, and actually hit your targets instead of vaguely chasing "2026 goals." Three months is a timeframe your brain can grip. Three months lets you see progress, make adjustments, and build momentum.

Try it. The difference is material.

BTC1,49%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartContractPhobia

· 22h ago

A 90-day plan is indeed more substantial and reliable compared to those vague annual goals.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 2025-12-31 16:58

I agree with this logic. Dividing by quarter is indeed more reliable than by year, especially since the market doesn't synchronize with the calendar.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMistaker

· 2025-12-31 16:56

NGL, quarterly positioning is indeed more reliable than following the annual goals. In the crypto world, it's all about who reacts faster.

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 2025-12-31 16:55

ngl the quarterly lens hits different... market psychology doesn't sync with our gregorian calendar fever dreams anyway. the rhythm's already there, we're just finally tuning in fr

Reply0

GasFeeBarbecue

· 2025-12-31 16:50

I like this approach. Securing quarterly positions is definitely more reliable than following the annual goals.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 2025-12-31 16:36

NGL quarterly system indeed outperforms the annual system. I did it like this last year... it’s really much faster. --- Dividing by quarters sounds good, but in practice it’s still easy to slack off... who doesn’t say 90 days but actually takes half a year to react? --- The logic makes sense, but the key is discipline. Without it, even the most detailed plan is useless. --- It’s better than blindly following trends, although I still tend to go all in and then regret it. --- Thinking back, I should do it this way in 2025. It’s a bit late to say 2026 now... let’s start next quarter.

View OriginalReply0