Legal scholar Lynn Stout challenges the principle of shareholder supremacy, arguing that a corporation is a separate entity and that shareholders only hold contractual rights rather than ownership. This view questions the goal of maximizing shareholder value, suggesting it can lead to short-termism. Applying this to the cryptocurrency space, debates over token holder rights may be misleading. If the protocol's goal is to build an participatory network rather than a profit-maximizing entity, then granting token holders fewer formal rights—viewing them as user investors similar to 19th-century infrastructure supporters—might promote development oriented towards practicality and long-term functionality rather than short-term gains.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Legal scholar Lynn Stout challenges the principle of shareholder supremacy, arguing that a corporation is a separate entity and that shareholders only hold contractual rights rather than ownership. This view questions the goal of maximizing shareholder value, suggesting it can lead to short-termism. Applying this to the cryptocurrency space, debates over token holder rights may be misleading. If the protocol's goal is to build an participatory network rather than a profit-maximizing entity, then granting token holders fewer formal rights—viewing them as user investors similar to 19th-century infrastructure supporters—might promote development oriented towards practicality and long-term functionality rather than short-term gains.