You have qualified for a draw of 5 Zama NFTs and plan to invest $1000 in the upcoming $ZAMA token sale.
Now I understand why NFT prices on the secondary market have plummeted over 90%—this is a clever design by the project team. Only core holders can participate in the token sale and early benefits; market buyers who enter later do not have these privileges.
From an incentive mechanism perspective, this is Zama's clever way of rewarding long-term community members. The true value lies in those who recognized the project early and hold the assets, rather than those who simply trade on the secondary market. This differentiated design creates a closed-loop ecosystem between NFT and token sale rights.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
tx_pending_forever
· 1h ago
Lucky you, catching this round early, betting $1000 is still worth it
---
Wait, a 90% crash is called a brilliant design? Feels like an excuse to cut the leeks
---
Envious, my NFT has now dropped to floor price, I regret not getting in earlier
---
A closed-loop ecosystem sounds great, but retail investors are still the ones being harvested
---
The priority rights for core holders, honestly, is just the difference between internal and external trading
---
It's great to participate in token sales, at least there's a chance to turn things around
---
I've heard this kind of rhetoric too many times, let's see if it can get listed on an exchange first
---
Are 5 NFTs of decent quality? Don't want rights to shrink later
---
The secondary market group is indeed miserable, bought at sky-high prices, now at bargain prices
---
Invest $1000, stay calm, and don't get caught in a trap
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 01-08 17:12
Wow, this is the real "ticket economy"
The smell of rug pull isn't as strong anymore
Wait, can I break even if I invest 1000 dollars? That's what I care about
By the way, the people in the secondary market really should learn what it means to plan ahead
NFTs go down the drain, but the rights are in hand, this strategy is actually pretty clever
But I still want to know if there will be another round of cutting leeks...
Those who got in early must be making a killing now
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 01-06 17:46
Oh wow, this is the real harvesting machine for retail investors...
Wait, just 5 NFTs can get free token sale rights? This logic feels a bit shady to me.
Early players make huge profits, while latecomers end up being the ones getting cut. No wonder the secondary market is crashing so badly.
Talking about incentive mechanisms, honestly, isn't it just a game for insiders... Retail investors really can't play this.
This kind of design is truly brilliant; the project team locks all the value in the hands of the holders with one move.
The key is that $1000 really isn't much compared to those institutions; it's still too small.
Let's wait and see when Zama gets listed on exchanges; entering at this point feels a bit like gambling...
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 01-06 17:38
Really, this design is brilliant, it's just to wash out those retail investors who follow the trend.
Going all in with $1000 is pretty ruthless; if you bet right, you fly, if you bet wrong, you cry.
The blood loss among those in the secondary market is no injustice; you should have seen it clearly before entering.
But on the other hand, this kind of setup really tends to foster a sense of unfairness...
Drawing 5 cards is truly luck-based, and being able to participate in the internal rounds is indeed exciting.
It seems like all projects are playing this way now—those with more privileges win.
This kind of differentiated distribution... no matter how you look at it, it seems to encourage token holders to spend money.
It's quite clever, but the underlying logic is still the same as cutting leeks.
Those who can get into this "ecosystem closed loop" are the lucky ones; most people can only watch from the sidelines.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobia
· 01-06 17:28
Damn, this is the real way to cut leeks
Wait, can an investment of $1000 really break even? Sounds a bit suspicious
People in the secondary market got perfectly exploited, the design is quite brutal
This logic is ridiculous, does a plummet in NFT prices actually mean good news? I feel like I've been brainwashed
Honestly, I still don't believe this. I've seen too many "ingenious designs" that end up being scams
Differentiated rights sound fancy, but it's really just about creating a small circle
NFT floor prices dropping like this and still claiming the design is beautiful, that's hilarious
I am damn that "simply doing the secondary market" leek, now suffering huge losses
This ecosystem closed-loop claim is too fancy, I only see my money gone
Lucky with the draw, but there’s still risk in investing, better to be cautious
You have qualified for a draw of 5 Zama NFTs and plan to invest $1000 in the upcoming $ZAMA token sale.
Now I understand why NFT prices on the secondary market have plummeted over 90%—this is a clever design by the project team. Only core holders can participate in the token sale and early benefits; market buyers who enter later do not have these privileges.
From an incentive mechanism perspective, this is Zama's clever way of rewarding long-term community members. The true value lies in those who recognized the project early and hold the assets, rather than those who simply trade on the secondary market. This differentiated design creates a closed-loop ecosystem between NFT and token sale rights.