The recent rebound of BSC, honestly, I don't care about price fluctuations. Anyone can pump the market; the key is whether there are real things that can be used.
I recently reopened the BSC browser, all because of the ListaDAO project.
The reason is quite straightforward: it’s not the kind of protocol that "talks about future prospects for half a day, but ends up empty." You can see at a glance what they are doing, and you can also immediately tell who will need it.
ListaDAO is doing a very pragmatic business—building a stable, low-cost lending + yield system for BSC.
The scenario is simple: you have assets but don’t want to close your position, and you need stablecoins for liquidity. So, you pledge assets, borrow stablecoins, and then go elsewhere to earn yields.
This logic has already been played out on Ethereum. But the problem is—BSC has never found a truly "safe, worry-free, scalable" implementation plan.
Lista aims to fill this gap.
Low operational costs, short processes, user-friendly interface—you don’t need to master DeFi jargon, nor do you have to sign a bunch of permissions repeatedly. In today’s environment, this is already a scarce commodity.
More importantly, the design approach clearly revolves around BSC’s real user base, rather than copying Ethereum’s template.
You’ll find that users of Lista are not those gamblers chasing 1000% annual yields. Instead, they are institutional and advanced users who already have scale and are starting to value "efficiency" and "fund liquidity."
This type of project has a characteristic: it may not be hot today and cold tomorrow, but it will gradually evolve into the infrastructure of the ecosystem.
By the time you truly realize its importance, a large amount of capital will already be flowing through it.
BSC is now at a sensitive time window: the ecosystem is beginning to wake up, funds are flowing back, but there aren’t many truly useful tools. ListaDAO hits this timing quite accurately.
To be honest, if BSC is going to go far this time, Lista is likely the project that can’t be avoided.
Some projects rely on stories for support; others survive on daily real usage traffic. Lista is obviously the latter.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeWhisperer
· 01-07 03:52
Really, price fluctuations are all虚的; usefulness is the key.
To be honest, Lista's recent操作确实戳中了需求点, not engaging in those虚头巴脑的东西.
Another project quietly building infrastructure, by the time everyone realizes it, it will have become the生态的毛细血管.
What BSC缺的就是这种顺手的工具, not causing trouble.
Institutional investors早就看清了, that群追年化的赌子根本用不了这东西.
Liquidity tools在生态里永远不会过时, this point is correct.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterZhang
· 01-07 03:50
In simple terms, it's about finding something truly usable, not just empty talk.
Everyone is hyping BSC recovery, but I actually prefer pragmatic projects like Lista that genuinely solve problems.
Institutional and large investors have already been active there; by the time retail investors realize, it's too late.
There are no stories, only real traffic—this is what makes a project sustainable in the long run.
Gamblers are chasing annualized returns, but smart people are focusing on efficiency and liquidity.
When it comes to infrastructure, if you think it's important, you're usually too late.
The old Ethereum-style approach is already dead; Lista is one of the reliable solutions that BSC has finally found.
Simple, easy to use, and brainless—this environment is truly rare nowadays.
After observing for a while, this isn't a project that heats up today and cools down tomorrow.
Low cost, short processes—that's enough; everything else is just虚的.
Currently, BSC really lacks tools that can be genuinely used.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 01-07 03:49
According to the database, since this article was published, what stage has Lista's promise entered? Waiting for the bloom.
How long has it been since the last statement about the "unavoidable project"? Suggest it be included in the Guinness World Records.
Honestly, we've heard this BSC story too many times... infrastructure, real traffic, institutional users, how fragrant has this pie fermented to now.
Is it clear at a glance? I’d rather see if this time it really won't be delayed.
Regarding real usage traffic, shall we reconcile the data again at the end of 2025?
Every time they say it's not a gambling project, but in the end, whoever runs fastest profits — same old story.
The key is whether there is something real that can be used — so let's wait and talk about it when the day of realization finally comes.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-07 03:45
Indeed, infrastructure projects are like this—no one cares early on, and by the time people realize it, it's already a done deal.
Real interaction volume is the key; anyone can make up stories.
Contract interaction data doesn't lie; if there's traffic, it has value.
The annualized yield temptation of baixao is not as good as trying it yourself to see if this thing is good or not.
What BSC needs are these ready-to-use products; don't bother with all those flashy things.
The key is who is truly using it, not who boasts the loudest.
These types of projects often rise silently; by the time they're discussed, it's already too late.
Agreed, don't chase stories—just look at TPS and genuine interactions. That's the right way to choose projects.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 01-07 03:43
Awesome, real stuff is truly real, you can tell just by looking without pretending.
By the way, the idea of Lista is really comfortable, no need to fuss.
Wait, why hasn't anyone done this before?
Someone should have filled this gap long ago.
That's right, the ecological infrastructure will eventually benefit from the dividends.
It's better to act first, anyway, there's nothing to lose.
This is the kind of project I want to see, not that fake stuff.
Only projects that speak with real traffic can last long; others are just bubbles.
I'm a bit tempted to try it out.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblin
· 01-07 03:41
That's the only reason I came back to check out BSC; Lista is indeed different.
Only after using it do you realize what it means to be hassle-free, unlike those who just tell stories every day.
I've seen through it long ago; infrastructure projects are like this—low-key but unavoidable.
Honestly, what the BSC ecosystem lacks is something that can truly be implemented.
Lista's timing is quite good; the node of BSC fund inflow is just right.
The user experience is indeed well done, without so many inexplicable authorization processes.
It won't be a sudden hype, but it will gradually become a necessity, which is the real moat.
If you want to activate liquidity of your assets, this is really enough.
Institutional entry has already begun, retail investors are still on the sidelines—that's the information gap.
If BSC really takes off, Lista can't be avoided, supported by data.
The recent rebound of BSC, honestly, I don't care about price fluctuations. Anyone can pump the market; the key is whether there are real things that can be used.
I recently reopened the BSC browser, all because of the ListaDAO project.
The reason is quite straightforward: it’s not the kind of protocol that "talks about future prospects for half a day, but ends up empty." You can see at a glance what they are doing, and you can also immediately tell who will need it.
ListaDAO is doing a very pragmatic business—building a stable, low-cost lending + yield system for BSC.
The scenario is simple: you have assets but don’t want to close your position, and you need stablecoins for liquidity. So, you pledge assets, borrow stablecoins, and then go elsewhere to earn yields.
This logic has already been played out on Ethereum. But the problem is—BSC has never found a truly "safe, worry-free, scalable" implementation plan.
Lista aims to fill this gap.
Low operational costs, short processes, user-friendly interface—you don’t need to master DeFi jargon, nor do you have to sign a bunch of permissions repeatedly. In today’s environment, this is already a scarce commodity.
More importantly, the design approach clearly revolves around BSC’s real user base, rather than copying Ethereum’s template.
You’ll find that users of Lista are not those gamblers chasing 1000% annual yields. Instead, they are institutional and advanced users who already have scale and are starting to value "efficiency" and "fund liquidity."
This type of project has a characteristic: it may not be hot today and cold tomorrow, but it will gradually evolve into the infrastructure of the ecosystem.
By the time you truly realize its importance, a large amount of capital will already be flowing through it.
BSC is now at a sensitive time window: the ecosystem is beginning to wake up, funds are flowing back, but there aren’t many truly useful tools. ListaDAO hits this timing quite accurately.
To be honest, if BSC is going to go far this time, Lista is likely the project that can’t be avoided.
Some projects rely on stories for support; others survive on daily real usage traffic. Lista is obviously the latter.