2026-01-07 20:23:06

Perpetual contract trading faces a classic trade-off: you want fast trading speeds and asset security, but also need liquidity and self-custody of assets. These requirements often conflict with each other and are hard to satisfy simultaneously.

A new approach is to adopt a hybrid architecture. An off-chain order matching engine can handle counterparty discovery and order matching, ensuring quick transaction execution; at the same time, settlement on Layer 2 solutions like zkSync guarantees on-chain security while significantly reducing gas costs. This way, users can enjoy CEX-level trading experience without sacrificing asset self-custody.

This kind of design is relatively rare in current perpetual trading platforms and is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

IronHeadMiner

· 01-07 20:46

The hybrid architecture is indeed comfortable, with fast off-chain and secure on-chain features. Finally, we can have both fish and bear paws... But it all depends on who can truly master zkSync. Currently, many are just talking without action.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 01-07 20:36

actually, the zkSync settlement piece here is doing some heavy lifting that the post kinda glosses over—like, sure you get the speed *and* the self-custody angle, but what about the trust assumptions baked into that offchain matching engine? feels like we're just shuffling the privacy problem around tbh

Reply0

NullWhisperer

· 01-07 20:25

honestly the hybrid architecture angle is interesting but let's not pretend the orderbook matching engine isn't just another centralized chokepoint waiting to happen. sure zkSync gives you the settlement guarantees, but who's actually auditing that off-chain logic? seen too many "innovative" protocols get rekt because nobody looked at the implementation details.

Reply0