2026-01-07 22:23:03

A leading exchange recently released a development plan for 2026, with core highlights directly addressing pain points—aiming for zero downtime throughout the year and pushing the trading experience to the extreme. Performance optimization, fee reductions, and maximum trading speed are all part of the clear goal: to become the smoothest trading platform in the blockchain space.

How should we interpret this move? Simply put, it's like a bubble tea shop first proving it has had no issues for a year, then announcing plans to upgrade to a top-tier flagship store with the best experience next year. The zero-downtime record over the past year has already showcased their technical strength, and now they are making a commitment to an ultimate trading experience. For DeFi users and high-frequency traders, this is indeed good news.

Industry rumors suggest that fees might be cut to around $0.0001, a pricing strategy that truly hits the market demand's sweet spot. From a competitive landscape perspective, while some compliant platforms are still busy with cross-chain bridging, this chain has already achieved top-tier stability. This "we iterate while others promote" pace seems somewhat unique in the fierce public chain competition.

However, it must also be said—no matter how beautiful the plan, it still needs to be implemented. Technical realization, counterattacks from competitors, regulatory pressures—all these could become variables along the way. Achieving the full goal is not guaranteed, but this direction itself points to a new approach for public chain development.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnChain_Detective

· 01-09 09:34

ngl, zero downtime is great and all but let me pull the data on whether they're actually *maintaining* it under stress... pattern analysis suggests these fee cuts usually precede something. always DYOR, not financial advice but the infrastructure claims need third-party audit verification before i buy it. high-risk indicators when promises get that specific

Reply0

BearMarketNoodler

· 01-07 22:53

Zero downtime at full capacity, transaction fees cut to $0.0001? Just listen, actual implementation is the real test. --- Another impressive plan, let's see the report card this time next year. --- This pace is indeed interesting, much more reliable than some platforms still bragging. --- Transaction fee of $0.0001 sounds great, but the technical implementation might be another story? --- No hype, no blackening, let's see the promises fulfilled first. --- What to do when competitors strike back? Plans can't keep up with changes. --- Focusing on stability is definitely the right direction, but don't just promote it, make it happen. --- I've seen too many of these plans, the key is still execution. --- Cutting transaction fees to that level really hits the pain point, but regulation is a tough hurdle. --- The zero downtime report card is real, as for the promises afterward, we'll see.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 01-07 22:48

Surface promises are easy to make; the key is whether they can actually deliver by 2026. Don't let it be just PPT rhetoric again.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 01-07 22:46

Transaction fees cut to 0.0001? Sounds good, but the reality might be another story. I believe in the zero downtime performance report, but extreme experience? Let's wait and see. Talking without action, another year has passed. Promises are promises, but I still look at on-chain data to speak. Other platforms boast loudly, but this one gets straight to work, which is interesting. With such low transaction fees, there's plenty of room for liquidity premiums. Is an arbitrage opportunity coming? Zero downtime + ultra-fast trading sounds great, but I'm worried it might just be PPT promises again. Counterattacks from competitors are inevitable; persistence is the key. This pace is indeed intense; not accepting it is not an option.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisfit

· 01-07 22:35

Zero downtime and still want to compete on trading experience? Nice talk, but actually implementing it is another matter. --- Transaction fees cut to 0.0001? Hold on, could this be just another marketing gimmick? --- Still making big promises, can you actually finish what you promised before bragging? --- Interesting, finally some exchanges are willing to take the user experience seriously. --- No, how will you pass regulatory scrutiny? No matter how smooth the trading system is, it still has to comply with the rules. --- Compared to publicity, I care more about whether the transaction fees can really be lowered or if it's just talk. --- Oh wow, are you about to directly confront other major exchanges? I want to see who will be the first to back down. --- Zero downtime for a year, I respect that, but using the phrase "ultimate experience" is a bit harsh. Let's wait and see if you get proven wrong.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 01-07 22:30

Zero downtime sounds great, but I’ll only believe it if the fees can really be cut down to 0.0001 It sounds good, but implementation is the key. Let’s wait and see if they get proven wrong Another big talk, I just want to see how next year turns out This approach... reminds me a bit of some promises made last year, hilarious Everyone can boast about performance optimization, but can they avoid a bunch of small issues? Only when transaction fees really come down will traders be the winners; everything else is pointless Just listen for now, we’ll talk when it’s live

View OriginalReply0