When two versions of the same token get launched simultaneously, with one already circulating, it creates genuine problems for the ecosystem. The redundancy, confused liquidity, and fragmented user base aren't just messy—they signal poor planning or worse. Whether you're still holding or you've already checked out, this kind of launch strategy deserves scrutiny. It's the sort of thing that erodes community trust faster than anything else.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrying
· 1h ago
Wow, this trick is really amazing. Who can handle two tokens flying out at the same time?
View OriginalReply0
SerNgmi
· 3h ago
Two versions launched simultaneously? Isn't this just digging your own grave... Liquidity is dispersed, and users' minds are blown. This kind of move is truly unmatched.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 11h ago
Damn, it's this kind of crappy operation again. Who's going to foot the bill for the scattered liquidity?
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperer
· 01-10 01:55
Bro, this kind of operation is a classic fail. Running two versions of the same coin simultaneously—who came up with this bad move?
Splitting liquidity was already not enough, and now they’re fragmenting it further. How are we supposed to play like this?
Project teams, can you please do some public relations quickly? Trust is already scraping the floor.
This move, not to mention newcomers, even veteran players have to question it.
Definitely a prelude to a rug pull, or maybe just pure incompetence.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 01-08 01:51
Laughing as I lose this one, watching the two tokens face off and call each other out
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 01-08 01:50
This move is really amazing, launching two tokens simultaneously? Liquidity shattered into pieces, who thought of this?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 01-08 01:50
Data shows that this dual-token parallel design is an unreasonable mechanism, and liquidity fragmentation is worsening when measured hourly.
View OriginalReply0
StakeHouseDirector
· 01-08 01:47
Another double token stunt, this wave is really a flop.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-08 01:33
Damn, this operation is purely a suicide mission for issuing tokens...
---
Launching dual tokens simultaneously? Isn't this just inviting trouble? Liquidity will be directly shattered.
---
No wonder the community exploded; such a basic mistake really hurts trust.
---
I just want to know what the team was thinking... This is way too unprofessional.
---
Dispersing liquidity is enough to be deadly, and they still have the nerve to call it a good project.
---
That's why I'm very cautious about new projects now... It's a common trick.
---
Red flags are flying, everyone. Whoever takes this deal will regret it.
When two versions of the same token get launched simultaneously, with one already circulating, it creates genuine problems for the ecosystem. The redundancy, confused liquidity, and fragmented user base aren't just messy—they signal poor planning or worse. Whether you're still holding or you've already checked out, this kind of launch strategy deserves scrutiny. It's the sort of thing that erodes community trust faster than anything else.