2026-01-08 01:50:35

#密码资产动态追踪 $BTC $ETH

⚠️ On-Chain Anomaly

A major wallet address just made frequent moves—$260 million worth of Bitcoin suddenly increased its holdings, with 8 consecutive successful trades, and this time going all-in on BTC again.

The timing is very interesting. Trump just announced a major policy today, yet this large fund activity appeared unexpectedly.

Is it a coincidence, or has a big player sensed something? From on-chain data, similar large positions have not been common recently. Who is really betting behind this market movement?

#加密市场 #BTC Analysis

BTC0,08%

ETH0,17%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RektButStillHere

· 5h ago

Wow, 260 million pre-placed? Does this big investor have an insider or are they just a pure gambler?

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 15h ago

It's the same trick again. Big players always hit the mark perfectly with their moves. I suspect they have teleportation portals installed.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 01-09 02:38

Damn, once again the big whales are the first to know, and us retail investors can only eat dust.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-08 02:20

This big whale's eight consecutive wins are truly amazing, it feels like they know the news even before Trump.

View OriginalReply0

PositionPhobia

· 01-08 02:19

It's the same old story again, 8 consecutive wins? Can on-chain data outperform policy messages? I don't believe you.

View OriginalReply0

RebaseVictim

· 01-08 02:18

Huh? How come this big investor is always one step ahead of us? Truly impressive.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-08 02:15

The big player's move is a bit aggressive, going all-in after 8 consecutive wins? It doesn't seem like just following the trend; there might really be insider information.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-08 02:08

It's another story of "smelling it in advance" — be careful with this line of reasoning — rearview mirror analysis is always the most accurate. An 8-game winning streak and going all-in? That's not mechanism design; that's pure gambling mentality. True position management should have a risk control framework, not going all-in based on policy news. Such an incentive mechanism will eventually cause problems.

View OriginalReply0