2026-01-08 11:26:00

The quality of projects within certain public chain ecosystems is really concerning. What are the aesthetic standards for these things being added? The Chinese expressions lack charm and cultural depth, feeling like just a pile of plain copywriting. Whether it's the project name or the promotional text, they all lack the necessary refinement. Does the project review team truly understand Chinese expression? Good projects should inherently have style; if they can't even achieve basic linguistic elegance, how can users trust them? This is not just nitpicking but a reflection of the overall quality of the ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationTherapist

· 01-11 10:57

Does this ecosystem review team not read any books? They just pile up like big cabbages.

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 01-08 11:55

ngl the narrative collapse here is almost poetic... ecosystem treating language like a failed rug pull tbh

Reply0

AirdropJunkie

· 01-08 11:49

I'm so frustrated. The standards for ecosystem review are really a mystery; any trash can pass. A bunch of stiff copies, what kind of style are they talking about? They can't even get the copywriting right and still want to take my money. These project teams really don't know how to name things, it's embarrassing. The review team is probably entirely AI-generated. The quality issue is indeed serious, but anyway, I will still participate in the airdrop haha. That's why I only look at the technology and not the promotion.

View OriginalReply0

RadioShackKnight

· 01-08 11:49

These projects are really just throwing everything in without any thought, even messing up the naming. Is the review team sleeping? Who approved this copywriting? There's no sense of taste at all, just clumsy patchwork. How dare they ask others to invest? The ecosystem is so rotten, no wonder people can't be retained. This is the most heartbreaking part—if the quality isn't up to standard, who would dare to trust it?

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-08 11:45

*adjusts alchemical instruments* the transmutation of mediocrity into legitimacy requires more than just empty token mechanics, fren. these projects read like failed yield farming spreadsheets dressed up in marketing copy... where's the elegance in protocol design? the mathematical poetry? it's all just noise masquerading as substance tbh

Reply0