South Korea's stablecoin policy is undergoing an adjustment. The Financial Services Commission(FSC) has changed its previous stance and now supports the central bank's plan — the issuance rights of stablecoins must be held by an alliance led by banks with majority control.
What does this mean? While tech companies can participate and even become the largest shareholders, the prerequisite is that banks always maintain overall majority control. In other words, the final say still belongs to traditional finance.
Regulators have also set strict thresholds for issuers — paid-in capital must reach 5 billion KRW (approximately $3.7 million). This figure may not seem particularly high, but regulatory authorities have explicitly stated that this standard will be raised as the market develops.
Requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges have also become more stringent. Standards for IT stability need to be improved, losses caused by hacking must be compensated forcibly, and violations can result in fines up to 10% of annual revenue. These combined provisions effectively increase the operational costs and risk thresholds for the entire industry.
Currently, there are differing voices within the parliament. It is expected that lawmakers will establish a dedicated working group to propose alternative legislative ideas for these plans. The game is still ongoing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ArbitrageBot
· 7h ago
Once again suppressing innovation, banks must be getting tired of playing the big head game... Are tech companies just cannon fodder?
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 8h ago
Here we go again, banks are firmly holding onto the narrative. This is the kind of "innovation" Korea wants, haha.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 01-08 11:55
Here we go again, the bank is going to freeze us again? Isn't this just the same old trick with a different flavor...
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 01-08 11:55
It's those old-fashioned bankers again, they simply don't want us to play.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 01-08 11:55
Coming back with this again? Banks must hold controlling stakes, tech companies are just employees, and the Web3 spirit dies once more.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 01-08 11:47
Once again, it's the banks holding things up; tech companies are just a facade.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 01-08 11:46
Bank card-based stablecoins, tech companies have become workers, and the form has already taken shape. This is the battle for the discourse power of traditional finance, and the retail investors are still dreaming of decentralization [laugh]
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-08 11:46
Once again, traditional finance is holding us back; banks insist on holding the majority of shares, and no matter how strong tech companies are, they have to bow their heads. Korea's approach is just blocking our way.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 01-08 11:37
It's the same old story; banks just don't want tech companies to play, essentially a battle of interests. Korea's recent moves will indeed raise the barriers, leading to a shuffle of small projects.
South Korea's stablecoin policy is undergoing an adjustment. The Financial Services Commission(FSC) has changed its previous stance and now supports the central bank's plan — the issuance rights of stablecoins must be held by an alliance led by banks with majority control.
What does this mean? While tech companies can participate and even become the largest shareholders, the prerequisite is that banks always maintain overall majority control. In other words, the final say still belongs to traditional finance.
Regulators have also set strict thresholds for issuers — paid-in capital must reach 5 billion KRW (approximately $3.7 million). This figure may not seem particularly high, but regulatory authorities have explicitly stated that this standard will be raised as the market develops.
Requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges have also become more stringent. Standards for IT stability need to be improved, losses caused by hacking must be compensated forcibly, and violations can result in fines up to 10% of annual revenue. These combined provisions effectively increase the operational costs and risk thresholds for the entire industry.
Currently, there are differing voices within the parliament. It is expected that lawmakers will establish a dedicated working group to propose alternative legislative ideas for these plans. The game is still ongoing.