2026-01-08 11:32:00

Few people realize that the AI agent issue we are discussing actually hides a fatal flaw.

By 2026, AI Agents will become the main trend in the industry, and there is already a consensus in the industry on this. But the real crisis lies in—where will the memories of these future millions or billions of intelligent agents be stored? If all are stored on centralized servers, deletion, tampering, and censorship nightmares could happen at any time. Only decentralized storage solutions can provide AI with a truly permanent and censorship-resistant memory bank.

From this perspective, the emergence of Walrus seems like an inevitable answer. It is not just a cloud storage tool; more accurately, it is becoming the infrastructure for the future AI era—the place that will host all intelligent agent memories. The Sui ecosystem’s advantage in high concurrency solves the AI computation challenge, while Walrus fills the last piece of the storage puzzle. The combination of the two constitutes a truly complete blockchain AI solution.

At this stage, Walrus, to be honest, is still in its infancy. Once AI applications on Sui begin to explode at scale, as a foundational consumable, its true value will gradually become apparent. By then, the current choice might be the early ticket to participate in the AI era.

WAL1,01%

SUI-0,48%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ser_ngmi

· 01-11 11:26

Damn, the centralized server setup really deserves to be killed off by decentralization long ago. Wait, can Walrus really support such a large ecosystem, or is it just another hype? We all know Sui's concurrency advantages, but is storage really a bottleneck? It feels a bit exaggerated. The infancy stage sounds nice, but in reality, it just hasn't taken off yet—it's all about betting on the future. There might still be a chance to get on board before 2026; this logic does seem to make sense.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-11 06:37

Wow, this logic is pretty solid. Centralized storage is indeed a pitfall. Everyone wants to secure a position, but the question is, can Walrus really be implemented now? Early access tickets always sound a bit vague... but it's definitely worth paying attention to. What do you think? Could it really be the next big trend in infrastructure?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 01-10 05:41

I've seen it all along, centralized storage is a ticking time bomb. Who dares to entrust all the memory of the intelligent agent to a single company? Wait, can Walrus really solve this problem, or is it just another hype concept? That's a valid point, but how long will it take for Sui's combination to truly be implemented? Selling at sky-high prices even in the infancy stage, a classic story-driven fundraising approach. But no one has really paid attention to this aspect; AI memory issues are the real game-changer. According to this logic, early deployment of decentralized storage is indeed wise. Both Sui and Walrus, with such a tight ecosystem, could risk concentration. This time, it's really a bit different; finally, someone is addressing the pain points.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 01-09 02:01

Wow, this logic is pretty solid. Using centralized servers for AI memory is indeed a big pitfall. Wait, can Walrus really solve this problem? It still feels a bit虚. I've heard this early entry pitch quite a lot... but the logical chain is indeed worth pondering. No matter how strong Sui's concurrency advantage is, it still depends on whether there's a killer app. Is this another "if you don't buy now, you'll regret it for life" story? Decentralizing memory is the right direction, but what makes Walrus think it can monopolize?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter

· 01-08 12:01

Amazing, no one really thought about storage issues --- Walrus's logic is a bit extreme, but we have to wait until Sui really takes off to say --- Centralized storage AI memory, it's quite terrifying when you think about it --- Feels like another castle in the air story, let's wait until it lands before discussing further --- Early bird ticket? I feel like it's gambling --- Decentralized storage AI memory sounds good, but can it actually work in practice? --- Sui's high concurrency is indeed impressive --- Entering at the infant stage? That's a pretty big gamble, brother --- So basically, it's about being optimistic about the future of the Sui ecosystem --- Logically consistent, but these types of projects carry huge risks, proceed with caution

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 01-08 11:56

Haha, this logic is a bit off. Is the centralized deletion method really feasible? Blockchain storage is expensive and slow, and AI training costs explode after just a few runs. How many times have I heard the phrase "early entry ticket"? Let's first see if Walrus can run smoothly.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-08 11:43

Another narrative of the "inevitable answer"—tired of hearing it. But memory storage has indeed been overlooked, and centralized approaches are too fragile. Walrus is still too young; who dares to say it can definitely rise to the top? Early access tickets always sound appealing, but the moment of "harvesting the leeks" often comes with it. Wait until AI truly explodes—no rush in the next one or two years. Reasonable suspicion that this is just paving the way for some project again.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-08 11:40

Ha, finally someone has explained this clearly. Centralized storage AI memory is a ticking time bomb. Walrus is indeed excellent, but is it too early to get on board now? Decentralized storage sounds good, but can it really support hundreds of millions of Agents? I’m still a bit skeptical. Sui’s concurrency is indeed impressive, let’s see if Walrus can keep up. Early entry always sounds right, but in reality, it’s another story of being harvested. This logic is a bit off; 2026 still feels so far away.

View OriginalReply0