2026-01-08 12:31:43

The upward surge arrived as expected, and the pullback range also stayed within the predicted bounds, with a high-low difference of about $40. Seemingly perfect prediction, but behind it hides a bunch of interesting questions.

Can the market really be predicted? That’s the premise. But even if it can, noise always objectively exists. How accurate are market makers’ stop-losses? Are the opposing forces truly driven by only one factor? And there’s the overlooked liquidity impact—the subtle relationship between price fluctuations and position shifts.

How do those caught in a position eventually become the ones closing it? How deep is the logic behind this transformation? It sounds simple, but to understand it thoroughly? Not that easy. Details determine everything, especially in a market where every millimeter counts.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartContractPlumber

· 6m ago

The $40 range is so precisely defined, how come the noise is suppressed so heavily, and what about the vulnerabilities caused by liquidity shocks?

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisfit

· 01-08 13:01

A $40 gap and you think your prediction is perfect, haha, how nice of you to say Details? Bro, details are just the knives the big players use to eat retail investors The logic of getting trapped and then breaking free is actually just one sentence: good luck Noise and liquidity shocks, sounds hardcore but actually just mean the market is too messy Stop-loss accuracy? Market makers have already taken us for a ride a long time ago

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 01-08 12:56

A $40 fluctuation is nothing, the key is how those brothers who were trapped managed to turn things around. I need to think this logic through carefully.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-08 12:45

$40 difference, perfect prediction? Ha, that's just survivor bias, brother. --- Noise is something that truly cannot be eliminated; market makers are also gambling. --- Getting trapped and then untrapped, just repeatedly cutting in and out. The key is to survive until that moment. --- Liquidity shocks are the real killers; 99% of people are completely unaware. --- Ask yourself, who can really predict the market? Even the blowhards haven't made money. --- Details determine everything, but most people haven't even understood the basic logic. --- Sounds nice, but it's just the opposing side playing us retail investors. --- This is the real on-chain truth; those so-called top influencers' predictions are all nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad

· 01-08 12:42

A $40 difference is "perfect prediction," hilarious. I could never learn this kind of confidence. Putting it in and taking it out again—does anyone really understand what happened in the middle? Liquidity is like a black box; no one knows how much is eaten up.

View OriginalReply0

MoonlightGamer

· 01-08 12:40

The 40-dollar fluctuation range is so precise, honestly it's a bit outrageous. I always feel there's some overlooked detail behind it. How do you get out of a position? I need to think about this logic carefully. Not everyone can have an epiphany. Are market makers' stop-losses really that precise? I find it hard to believe, with so much noise in the market. Liquidity shocks are indeed deeply hidden. Most people haven't even noticed. Predicting the market? Easy to say, once noise hits, everything becomes meaningless.

View OriginalReply0