2026-01-08 14:28:19

DeepNode has recently been launched on multiple exchanges simultaneously, and the underlying intention behind this move is worth pondering. Frequent simultaneous launches often indicate that the project has put effort into liquidity allocation and market readiness.

DeepNode ($DN)'s core innovation lies in redefining the rights relationship for model developers. In the traditional model, AI model creators act as suppliers within the platform ecosystem, but DeepNode shifts this logic—allowing developers to actually own their IP assets, rather than just working for a centralized platform. This adjustment in ownership structure opens up different possibilities within the Web3 context. The synchronized deployment across multiple chains and liquidity layout reflects, to some extent, the project's ambition for ecosystem expansion.

DN4,26%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PonziWhisperer

· 9h ago

Launching multiple chains at once just to dump the market, I've seen this trick many times. AI model developers having their own IP? Sounds good, but let's see if it can actually be implemented. Both liquidity and ecosystem expansion—where did all the money go? Can this time avoid becoming another worthless coin? DeepNode has such a big reputation, will it form a group? The ownership structure sounds sophisticated, but it still feels like just rebranding work. Wait, can multi-chain deployment really solve the problem, or is this just another marketing stunt?

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 01-09 22:36

Multi-chain simultaneous launch, interesting. This time, it's really about making a move. Can developers truly own IP? If this materializes, it will definitely change the game. Such thoughtful liquidity deployment, either they are truly capable or just gambling on the future. Anyway, I'll get on the train first and see. Transforming from a supplier to an owner, this is how Web3 should be played. The way Qifa Exchange is doing this shows that there is indeed someone pouring money behind it. DeepNode's move is quite aggressive; the developer rights and interests really hit the pain points. However, multi-chain deployment does not equal project stability; it still depends on how the subsequent ecosystem develops.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 01-09 02:37

Multi-chain simultaneous launch indeed has its nuances; pouring so much liquidity in shows they're really investing heavily. Developers owning their own IP—there's some real logic there, no need to be cut out by the platform anymore. Is this all the hype for the simultaneous launch? Feels like the market response isn't meeting expectations. Ownership is definitely the way forward for Web3, but whether it can truly be realized is another matter. This wave of momentum feels a bit rushed; are they trying to dump?

View OriginalReply0

0xLuckbox

· 01-08 14:58

The multi-chain simultaneous launch strategy does seem to have some real potential, with liquidity being aggressively built up. Developers finally don't have to do manual labor for big corporations anymore, I like this logic. Speaking of this wave of ecosystem expansion, whether it can truly be implemented or is just another prelude to a new round of profit-taking? The ownership structure sounds promising; let's see how it develops moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 01-08 14:57

The multi-chain simultaneous launch is an old trick; the key is whether it can hold up the liquidity in the future.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 01-08 14:54

Cross-chain deployment is really just storytelling; the key is whether the liquidity is deep enough. Developers owning IP assets actually have something valuable; it's much better than doing free labor for big companies. Wait, can DeepNode truly ensure developers' rights and interests? Or is it just a paper promise? It feels like the project team is just laying the groundwork. Can multi-chain deployment be fully understood? That's a bit greedy. Reshaping ownership sounds great, but what about trading depth? Don't let it be just superficial liquidity. Launching multiple exchanges simultaneously—is this paving the way for future actions? Quite interesting. Finally, AI model developers won't be exploited anymore? That depends on how it’s done in the long run.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-08 14:49

Multi-chain launch, I get the vibe, another wave of hype. But can developers really obtain the IP ownership? Or is it just another PPT promise?

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 01-08 14:49

Multi-chain deployment, I've seen many methods like this, but the logic of $DN is indeed a bit different. Developers truly owning the IP? Compared to those traditional big companies freeloading on models, this really feels like a revolutionary thing. Just not sure how long the liquidity can support, and how retail investors will play when they enter. It feels like playing a very big game of chess; I believe in the ambition of ecosystem expansion. Multi-chain layout + ownership release, if this combination hits the mark, it can indeed change some things. By the way, the real test should be whether developers will really stay and participate.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 01-08 14:45

Using the multi-chain launch routine has become boring. Honestly, it's just because they're afraid of poor liquidity causing a dump. I've heard all the developer ownership talk too many times; in the end, it's still about the coin price.

View OriginalReply0