The gameplay patterns of Chinese MEME coins over the past two years are quite interesting. In simple terms, it’s about leveraging the popularity of certain crypto influencers to create memes and attract traffic. Why do they always focus on these top figures? It’s mainly because they come with built-in hype; their every move can spark discussions.
Look at those projects that claim to "get XXX’s attention" or "make XXX notice," on the surface they’re just playing with memes and interactions, but in reality, it’s a set of mature marketing tactics. First, they create buzz and topics to attract people to share and repost, forming a viral spread. Then they hint at "being recognized by major platforms" or "listing on exchanges," giving participants an expectation — maybe this time, following the trend will double their investment. Isn’t this a typical pump-and-dump approach?
But what’s the reality? Industry veterans simply wouldn’t spend their energy on projects without real applications, and they’re even quite annoyed by this kind of bundled marketing. Truly valuable and reliable projects rely on solid technology, clear business direction, and practical ecosystem development. There’s no need to shout every day "get someone’s attention" just to grab eyeballs.
MEME coins themselves aren’t inherently problematic; the key is not to be misled by projects that are all hype and lack substance. Before investing, think carefully: besides the celebrity effect, what else does this project have?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StableGenius
· 01-12 04:54
nah this is just recycled exit liquidity with extra steps lol
Reply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-09 10:34
It's the same old scam; I'm already tired of it.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcer
· 01-09 08:38
It's the same old trick again, really getting annoying.
The routine is just routine; no matter how you package it, it's useless.
Honestly, I've never seen this type of project succeed.
Constantly riding the hype, it's outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 01-09 06:56
Another "get the big V's attention" move, I'm already aesthetically exhausted.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 01-09 06:55
Another scam coin, and the newbies are still dreaming.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomMiner
· 01-09 06:49
It's the same old trick again, and some people really believe it.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 01-09 06:39
It's the same old story, right? The point is valid, but people still fall for it.
The gameplay patterns of Chinese MEME coins over the past two years are quite interesting. In simple terms, it’s about leveraging the popularity of certain crypto influencers to create memes and attract traffic. Why do they always focus on these top figures? It’s mainly because they come with built-in hype; their every move can spark discussions.
Look at those projects that claim to "get XXX’s attention" or "make XXX notice," on the surface they’re just playing with memes and interactions, but in reality, it’s a set of mature marketing tactics. First, they create buzz and topics to attract people to share and repost, forming a viral spread. Then they hint at "being recognized by major platforms" or "listing on exchanges," giving participants an expectation — maybe this time, following the trend will double their investment. Isn’t this a typical pump-and-dump approach?
But what’s the reality? Industry veterans simply wouldn’t spend their energy on projects without real applications, and they’re even quite annoyed by this kind of bundled marketing. Truly valuable and reliable projects rely on solid technology, clear business direction, and practical ecosystem development. There’s no need to shout every day "get someone’s attention" just to grab eyeballs.
MEME coins themselves aren’t inherently problematic; the key is not to be misled by projects that are all hype and lack substance. Before investing, think carefully: besides the celebrity effect, what else does this project have?