To compare the differences between the meme projects on BSC and Solana, ultimately it comes down to the developers' abilities and mindset.

On BSC, high-quality developers are extremely rare, and truly impressive ones are few and far between. Most developers follow the trend heavily, copying whatever concept is popular, lacking originality. The drive for innovation mainly relies on a few top figures promoting and hyping projects to maintain interest. The entire ecosystem frequently fragments, and projects must constantly create topics to stay hot. Essentially, this is just consuming retail investors' emotions.

The situation on the Solana chain is completely different. Most developers here are foreign teams, many of whom are pioneers in their respective fields. Even if early projects perform modestly, as long as the foundational concept is innovative enough, they are easily noticed by large funds later on. Once they gain attention, community enthusiasm and consensus can naturally build up. This is the true sustainable growth logic.

From the perspective of chain attributes, Solana is more concept-driven, while BSC is more trend-driven. This also explains why big whales and institutions are willing to invest long-term in Solana, whereas their interest in BSC is always fleeting. In terms of value support and ecosystem vitality, the two chains are indeed on different levels.