Sometimes when you look at successful exchanges, you wonder how they managed to survive the toughest times.



The story goes back to August 2017. A leading exchange had just been online for 16 days when the founder recorded a video in a simple office. At that time, he didn’t wear his signature black-rimmed glasses yet; he was dressed in a regular Polo shirt, looking serious. Why? Because the platform’s token had just been listed for over two weeks and had fallen below the issuance price, and community opinion was under immense pressure.

The key moment came—under extreme financial strain, the founder made a bold decision: publicly apologize and then announce that 40% of the company's liquid assets would be directly used to empower the token. In other words, he chose not to profit initially but to stabilize user confidence.

There are several details in this report that are particularly worth pondering:

First, he revealed the token holding situation of ICO participants—less than 15% had sold. This data is crucial; it proves that major holders still had confidence, which could stabilize morale with a single statement.

Second, he clearly stated that the platform and ecosystem partners would only accept this token in the future, fully integrating it into a deflationary and usage cycle. From a business design perspective, this effectively locked the token’s value into the platform’s growth.

Another detail is his attitude toward competition—he openly admitted that there would be over 1,000 competitors in this industry and even welcomed others to compete. At that time, such transparency was truly rare.

At the end of the video, he said: "This token will definitely succeed." It proved he wasn’t just talking. From an initial price of $0.15 to around $900 now, that’s a rise of over 6,000 times.

Looking back at the current ecosystem layout and market position of this exchange empire, it was actually set in stone back in that office in August 2017. The choices made by one person during the most difficult moments often determine the future trajectory.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
0xSherlockvip
· 01-12 05:36
This is faith, really. 40% of liquid funds can be wiped out in an instant. If it were me, I'd have already run away, bro.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 01-09 21:39
Wow, this is the real All in. Dropped 40% of liquid funds directly... If it were me, I’d be terrified, but if they bet right, they become a god.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 01-09 07:02
Damn, this guy really dared to gamble back then, throwing in 40% of his liquid assets... If it were me, I would have already run away.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidatorvip
· 01-09 07:02
2017 was truly a historic moment, but to be honest, risking 40% of funds to stabilize the market during a tight liquidity period is an operation that would probably have blown up by now. It all depends on whether the founders have enough confidence.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStrugglervip
· 01-09 07:01
Wow, this is where confidence is truly valuable. Betting 40% of your liquid assets to say "I believe"... Looking back now, it was indeed a bold move.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 01-09 06:51
Wow, this is true all-in. Investing 40% of the liquidity to stabilize morale, if it were me, I would have already run away.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt