2026-01-09 07:23:24

In the world of Crypto, it often feels like exploring the vast ocean—opportunities everywhere, traps lurking around every corner. Especially when it comes to data storage, traditional cloud services are like domineering landlords, insisting on locking your data in their warehouses, then raising prices or shutting down services at will. Developers suffer greatly; wanting to use AI for big data training, they have to be on constant alert, fearing privacy leaks or server crashes.

Just when everyone was tangled in these issues, a project called Walrus Protocol quietly emerged. The name sounds a bit cute—yes, "Walrus"—but this guy is not here to be adorable. It is a decentralized storage protocol developed by Mysten Labs, specifically targeting large, high-traffic data like 4K videos, high-resolution images, and AI models—what we call "fat data."

The core idea is this: when you upload a video, it doesn't get dumped entirely into a big company's data center. Instead, it uses erasure coding to split the file into multiple fragments, then disperses them across nodes worldwide for storage. Each node only holds a part of the data, so even the cleverest hacker can't piece together the full content. Data security is physically broken down this way.

What's even more interesting is that the stored data is programmable. Using Move language to write smart contracts, you can precisely control who has access, how much to charge, and how long to retain the data. Storage is no longer a passive service; it becomes a flexible, schedulable asset. This sounds like science fiction, but in reality, it is already running on the Sui blockchain.

Why is this worth paying attention to? Because Walrus is not just solving technical storage problems; it is exploring a new data economy model in the Crypto era. In this new model, the relationships among data owners, storage providers, and users can be completely redefined.

SUI-0,41%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-12 03:54

The erasure coding logic is indeed clever, but the real bottleneck lies in the incentive layer—why would global nodes maintain these fragments for the long term? --- The Elephant Protocol sounds promising, but I'm worried it might be just another project that is "theoretically perfect but practically unfeasible." --- From a technical architecture perspective, the programmability of Move smart contracts has indeed changed the storage paradigm, but there's no detailed discussion on data availability and retrieval efficiency, which is a bit disappointing. --- Basically, it's just rebranding the "hegemony" issue of traditional cloud services from a different angle, but can users accept the increased operational complexity brought by decentralization? --- It's worth noting that the Sui ecosystem itself isn't active enough to support storage demands of this level. --- After a calm analysis, where does this improve over IPFS? Is it programmability? Or does it truly solve the incentive problem? --- Erasure coding distributed storage isn't a new concept. What exactly is Walrus's core innovation? We need to look at the white paper before drawing conclusions.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 01-09 07:53

Walrus sounds very 🐳, but this idea does have some substance --- Erasure coding distributed storage? Fine, just worried it might be another PPT project --- As for programmable storage, if it can really run stably, this gameplay is indeed disruptive --- To be honest, centralized cloud services are just too powerful, someone needs to come and shake things up --- It's already running on Sui? Then we need to see how it performs in practice, don’t just listen to the stories --- The new data economy model sounds grand, but how much it can actually save small users is the key, right? --- I love the logic of physical decomposition data security; finally someone is seriously tackling this issue

View OriginalReply0

RegenRestorer

· 01-09 07:40

Walrus is indeed a unique name, but on the technical level, it really hits the pain points. --- Erasure coding distributed storage is much better than relying on cloud service providers for single points of failure. --- Wait, can programmable storage truly completely prevent data leaks? It still seems to depend on the conscience of the node operators. --- Mysten Labs is up to something again; the Sui ecosystem is becoming more and more interesting. --- It sounds good, but the problem is, who will guarantee that those global nodes won't become centralized? --- Finally, someone is taking on the monopoly of traditional cloud service providers. This kind of thing has been needed for a long time. --- Writing storage logic in Move language sounds like wresting AWS's pricing power back into the hands of users. --- The term "fat data" is hilarious; it really is the most disadvantageous time for large files. --- If it can truly run stably, developers' nightmares could be reduced by more than half. --- But from the death of decentralized storage to now still trying, it seems this path isn't so smooth.

View OriginalReply0