Online payment cards get really annoying when they are "Confirming," just spinning in circles. But what if this is a million-dollar transaction? What if something goes wrong and the system can still roll back?
The biggest fear in financial transactions isn't slowness; it's uncertainty. On Wall Street, no one plays "maybe possibly"—every second involves real gold and silver. Exposure risk, hedging costs, over time, these costs become unbearable. Even more frightening is settlement risk, like after transferring a house, the housing authority suddenly says there's a system issue, data rollback occurs, and the house is no longer yours. This is simply unthinkable in finance.
What about ordinary blockchains? Everyone is competing on speed, but speed doesn't equal security. DUSK's approach is completely different—they've developed a Succinct Attestation mechanism, whose core goal isn't to chase infinite block production speed but to ensure that once a transaction is "finalized," it is truly locked in with no possibility of rollback.
You can think of it like the moment an auction hammer falls. "Bang," the highest bidder wins, witnessed by all, and from then on, there's no changing the outcome. DUSK's SA is this hammer, rapidly voting through a random validator committee to form an irreversible consensus. Once finalized, subsequent actions on the chain—disbursements, report updates, regulatory filings—can be triggered immediately. Only then can institutions confidently move real assets onto the chain.
The DUSK token is the ticket to participate in this "deterministic auction." With this credibility, traditional assets like stocks and bonds are willing to be traded on-chain.
So don't just focus on TPS numbers. Ask yourself the truly important question about this chain: Is your "hammer" solid? Does it ring loud? Are you willing to be responsible for the finality of transactions? That is DUSK's true competitive edge.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BoredRiceBall
· 01-12 01:11
Million-dollar funds stuck in a loop? Now that's the real nightmare. The folks on Wall Street have already turned against each other. I kind of get the idea behind DUSK; the key isn't speed but finality—once a decision is made, there's no turning back... But honestly, it's a trust issue. Do institutions dare to really move their money onto the chain—that's the ultimate test, right?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 01-11 05:38
On-chain data shows that the Validator voting cycle under the SA mechanism is indeed three orders of magnitude faster than traditional PoS, but the interesting part is—have their rollback risks really been eliminated? I need to dig into the contract code to believe it.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 01-09 07:51
This SA mechanism is indeed tough, but to be honest, whether it can truly "knock out" depends on actual combat.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 01-09 07:49
Alright, the "hammer" hardness is indeed an issue, but the problem is that anyone can shout finality; there are very few who can actually deliver.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-09 07:49
Once you make a move, you have to be accountable, or how can you play finance? Matters involving real gold and silver are too ambiguous and can be deadly.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 01-09 07:47
One million dollars stuck in a loop? Man, that must be really frustrating... The idea behind DUSK is indeed different. Instead of relying on stacking TPS to hard push, it aims to make a decisive move. This is truly a real necessity in finance.
Online payment cards get really annoying when they are "Confirming," just spinning in circles. But what if this is a million-dollar transaction? What if something goes wrong and the system can still roll back?
The biggest fear in financial transactions isn't slowness; it's uncertainty. On Wall Street, no one plays "maybe possibly"—every second involves real gold and silver. Exposure risk, hedging costs, over time, these costs become unbearable. Even more frightening is settlement risk, like after transferring a house, the housing authority suddenly says there's a system issue, data rollback occurs, and the house is no longer yours. This is simply unthinkable in finance.
What about ordinary blockchains? Everyone is competing on speed, but speed doesn't equal security. DUSK's approach is completely different—they've developed a Succinct Attestation mechanism, whose core goal isn't to chase infinite block production speed but to ensure that once a transaction is "finalized," it is truly locked in with no possibility of rollback.
You can think of it like the moment an auction hammer falls. "Bang," the highest bidder wins, witnessed by all, and from then on, there's no changing the outcome. DUSK's SA is this hammer, rapidly voting through a random validator committee to form an irreversible consensus. Once finalized, subsequent actions on the chain—disbursements, report updates, regulatory filings—can be triggered immediately. Only then can institutions confidently move real assets onto the chain.
The DUSK token is the ticket to participate in this "deterministic auction." With this credibility, traditional assets like stocks and bonds are willing to be traded on-chain.
So don't just focus on TPS numbers. Ask yourself the truly important question about this chain: Is your "hammer" solid? Does it ring loud? Are you willing to be responsible for the finality of transactions? That is DUSK's true competitive edge.