I recently came across a new project in the AI infrastructure sector. Here's a brief summary of my research notes.
**Project Fundamentals**
This project is positioned in the AI infrastructure track, mainly providing services such as models, computing power, and data. The total token supply is 100 million, with an initial circulation ratio of 22.5%. Regarding token release structure, network emissions and grants account for 12%, the treasury 1%, liquidity pools 7.5%, and airdrops 2%.
**Team and Background Concerns**
Honestly, after reviewing the official materials, my vigilance increased. The official Twitter account was only created three months ago, which looks like a quick setup. The CEO's Twitter is also carefully curated, with data indicators that clearly show signs of artificial boosting. The team information is mostly undisclosed; the only visible CEO appears to be more of a figurehead. Although there’s no direct evidence, my intuition suggests that a Chinese team might be behind the operation.
**Funding Breakdown**
The official has disclosed two funding rounds, with one more not detailed. During the seed round, the FDV was estimated at $25 million, raising $2 million, corresponding to 8% of tokens. The strategic round increased the FDV to $75 million, raising $3 million, corresponding to 4% of tokens. The investors are not particularly well-known institutions, but there is indeed a Chinese-background fund among them.
The earliest private round is undisclosed. Based on conventional logic, it’s likely a $10 million FDV raising $1 million, representing 1% of tokens.
**Current Price and Market Cap**
The current primary market price is $0.8, corresponding to an $80 million FDV and a $18 million circulating market cap. The numbers seem relatively rational, but there’s a problem—early investors have already seen several times their initial gains.
**My Perspective**
Overall, the fundamentals of this project are quite average. Going from zero to one in three months suggests either acquiring a ready-made project shell or a complete packaging effort. From my perspective, there’s little to look forward to in terms of actual contracts.
The secondary market is not cost-effective for participation, for two reasons: first, the costs in seed and private rounds are very low, and the current opening price already yields several times profit for them; second, the risk is entirely uncontrollable—there are no tools to verify airdrop mechanisms, no information available, and the chips are basically in the hands of the project team.
As always—do your own homework.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMisfit
· 01-10 13:05
Another quick success story by a Chinese team, going from zero to one in three months. I've seen this routine too many times. Not touching it.
---
With such low costs for private placements, entering now just means taking over early, be clear about that.
---
Did the official account just start three months ago? Ha, that really explains a lot.
---
That carefully crafted persona of the CEO is obviously a marketing stunt; honestly, it's a bit ridiculous.
---
All the chips are in the hands of the project team. Who can bear the risk of an airdrop? I really don't dare to gamble.
---
There's no point in doing secondary trading; early birds are already full, it's not our turn.
---
Based on this financing logic, the earliest private placements should be the most valuable at their core. Entering now isn't very strategic.
---
The fundamentals are just average, and the team information is completely undisclosed. I don't touch these kinds of things.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-09 08:02
Another quick scheme operated by Chinese people, starting from zero and rushing to raise funds in just three months. I really can't see what's worth looking forward to.
The CEO's Twitter data is just a quick boost in numbers; projects like this are just to offload early investors.
AI infrastructure sounds good, but in reality, it's just a shell.
Wait, you're planning to get in? I advise you not to. The chips are in their hands.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-09 08:02
It's another shell project operated by Chinese people. I've seen many such quick setups in three months.
It's the same old trick again—CEO's Twitter carefully curated, data inflated, team information kept secret... my intuition tells me it's a Chinese team cutting leeks behind the scenes.
Is it worth entering now at 0.8 for the first level? How much did the seed round cost? They've already made several times the profit, alright?
The airdrop mechanism lacks transparency, and all the chips are in the hands of the project team. This risk is uncontrollable, brother.
Instead of chasing high prices, it's better to wait for market education to complete.
For secondary betting projects, it's more prudent to buy established blue chips.
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhale
· 01-09 07:59
Three months to get up to speed, team information concealed, overinflated funding valuations... I've seen this routine too many times. Early investors are already full, and if we get involved, we'll just be the bag holders.
It's best not to touch such projects. The airdrop mechanism is completely a black box, and the risks are ridiculously high.
If the chips are in the project's hands, it's doomed. Let's switch to another project.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 01-09 07:48
Another one of these quick March pump-and-dump schemes, the CEO is hyping it up for cheap. Let's pass on this one.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 01-09 07:45
ah, three-month twitter account with shady tokenomics and mystery early rounds... *checks notes* yeah, this is literally the 2021 playbook. early investors already up 5x while retail hasn't even loaded the charts yet lol
I recently came across a new project in the AI infrastructure sector. Here's a brief summary of my research notes.
**Project Fundamentals**
This project is positioned in the AI infrastructure track, mainly providing services such as models, computing power, and data. The total token supply is 100 million, with an initial circulation ratio of 22.5%. Regarding token release structure, network emissions and grants account for 12%, the treasury 1%, liquidity pools 7.5%, and airdrops 2%.
**Team and Background Concerns**
Honestly, after reviewing the official materials, my vigilance increased. The official Twitter account was only created three months ago, which looks like a quick setup. The CEO's Twitter is also carefully curated, with data indicators that clearly show signs of artificial boosting. The team information is mostly undisclosed; the only visible CEO appears to be more of a figurehead. Although there’s no direct evidence, my intuition suggests that a Chinese team might be behind the operation.
**Funding Breakdown**
The official has disclosed two funding rounds, with one more not detailed. During the seed round, the FDV was estimated at $25 million, raising $2 million, corresponding to 8% of tokens. The strategic round increased the FDV to $75 million, raising $3 million, corresponding to 4% of tokens. The investors are not particularly well-known institutions, but there is indeed a Chinese-background fund among them.
The earliest private round is undisclosed. Based on conventional logic, it’s likely a $10 million FDV raising $1 million, representing 1% of tokens.
**Current Price and Market Cap**
The current primary market price is $0.8, corresponding to an $80 million FDV and a $18 million circulating market cap. The numbers seem relatively rational, but there’s a problem—early investors have already seen several times their initial gains.
**My Perspective**
Overall, the fundamentals of this project are quite average. Going from zero to one in three months suggests either acquiring a ready-made project shell or a complete packaging effort. From my perspective, there’s little to look forward to in terms of actual contracts.
The secondary market is not cost-effective for participation, for two reasons: first, the costs in seed and private rounds are very low, and the current opening price already yields several times profit for them; second, the risk is entirely uncontrollable—there are no tools to verify airdrop mechanisms, no information available, and the chips are basically in the hands of the project team.
As always—do your own homework.