Looking at the $BFKH token, the warning signs are pretty glaring. You've got team members with a history attached to failed projects like $Useless—that's a massive red flag right there. When past scammers resurface under new projects, it's rarely a coincidence. The pattern repeats: fresh branding, similar playbook, same end result. What could have been a legitimate opportunity got hijacked by the usual suspects. The crypto space keeps teaching us the same lesson: always dig into who's actually behind the project, not just what they're promising.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeVictim
· 3h ago
It's the same old trick, $Useless 's crew now changing names and aliases to scam more people, truly impressive...
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkeptic
· 22h ago
It's the same old trick again, $BFKH changing the soup but not the medicine, the same people using the same scam, really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSats
· 01-09 08:57
Another rebranded scam? When will those people finally stop? They think no one will recognize them just by changing the name.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-09 08:53
It's the same old trick again. The @Useless@ group just changes their disguise and comes back, really thinking we're fools. From the supply and demand curve, the speed at which this kind of project goes bankrupt is comparable to the devaluation of Da Vinci manuscripts... Honestly, where's the decentralized spirit? Where's the DAO governance mechanism? They're all just a bunch of pretenses.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 01-09 08:51
Same old trick, just changing the skin to keep scamming, huh? The @Useless@ bunch is still here...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-09 08:40
It's the same old trick, changing skins to continue scamming users, truly unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValue
· 01-09 08:36
Damn, $Useless people are causing trouble again? They really never learn.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrownies
· 01-09 08:35
The mouse trap with a different disguise is back again. I can see through this trick with my eyes closed.
Looking at the $BFKH token, the warning signs are pretty glaring. You've got team members with a history attached to failed projects like $Useless—that's a massive red flag right there. When past scammers resurface under new projects, it's rarely a coincidence. The pattern repeats: fresh branding, similar playbook, same end result. What could have been a legitimate opportunity got hijacked by the usual suspects. The crypto space keeps teaching us the same lesson: always dig into who's actually behind the project, not just what they're promising.