A question worth pondering: Can decentralized finance (DeFi) really replace traditional banks?
My view is that the probability is not very high. Instead of saying DeFi will overthrow traditional banks, it's more accurate to say that the two will gradually move towards integration. Each has its own significant flaws and advantages.
**What are the current bottlenecks of DeFi?**
First, security issues are quite tricky. Smart contract vulnerabilities, coding errors, and hacking attacks often result in user losses. Cryptocurrency assets themselves are highly volatile, and without a stable value anchor, risk management becomes a major challenge.
Second, regulation is still unclear. The anonymous nature of DeFi and cross-border liquidity make anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance particularly difficult to implement. A unified global regulatory framework has yet to be established, making large-scale adoption very challenging.
Third, user experience cannot be ignored. Private key management and on-chain interactions are too complex for most people, making it less user-friendly for ordinary users.
**What are the advantages of traditional banks?**
This is where it gets interesting. Government-backed credit, mature regulatory systems—these forms of public trust cannot be easily replicated by DeFi in the short term. For scenarios involving large sums of money or corporate credit, users still trust traditional banks more.
Additionally, services like credit lending are not yet feasible in DeFi. Traditional banks, based on offline scenarios and multi-source data credit evaluation systems, can meet diverse needs such as unsecured small loans and business loans. DeFi, on the other hand, mainly relies on over-collateralized loans, which have a much narrower scope.
Offline branches and comprehensive customer service systems also cover user groups who are less familiar with digital technology. DeFi cannot quickly fill this gap.
Therefore, rather than competing, it’s better to see them as complementary. DeFi innovates financial methods, while traditional banks learn and adapt. Ultimately, the future will likely be a fusion of both. What are your thoughts?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGrillMaster
· 01-10 08:11
It's easy to talk about integration, but honestly, the banking system can't be changed.
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 01-09 09:52
Fusion theory sounds good, but frankly, it still depends on who kneels first.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 01-09 09:46
融合论听着不错,但说实话监管那关才是死穴。
---
Security issues should have been a priority long ago; contract vulnerabilities need someone to oversee.
---
Doing credit loans in DeFi is really too difficult; who would dare to use a system without data backing?
---
Self-custody of private keys has discouraged 99% of people; this is outrageous.
---
Complementary or competitive, let's see who gets the regulatory approval first.
---
The traditional banking credit system is indeed unbeatable; DeFi can't compete in the short term.
---
The sense of security backed by the government is something blockchain can't provide.
---
The limitations of over-collateralized lending are truly fatal.
---
Offline branch networks are always a weakness for DeFi.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLord
· 01-09 09:42
Fusion is ideal in theory, but difficult in practice. The banking system simply can't accept the decentralized approach.
View OriginalReply0
MoonBoi42
· 01-09 09:41
Fusion theory sounds good, but I don't think banks really want to be innovated on.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 01-09 09:40
The word "融合" (integration) sounds nice, but in reality, who really believes that DeFi can complement traditional banks?
A question worth pondering: Can decentralized finance (DeFi) really replace traditional banks?
My view is that the probability is not very high. Instead of saying DeFi will overthrow traditional banks, it's more accurate to say that the two will gradually move towards integration. Each has its own significant flaws and advantages.
**What are the current bottlenecks of DeFi?**
First, security issues are quite tricky. Smart contract vulnerabilities, coding errors, and hacking attacks often result in user losses. Cryptocurrency assets themselves are highly volatile, and without a stable value anchor, risk management becomes a major challenge.
Second, regulation is still unclear. The anonymous nature of DeFi and cross-border liquidity make anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) compliance particularly difficult to implement. A unified global regulatory framework has yet to be established, making large-scale adoption very challenging.
Third, user experience cannot be ignored. Private key management and on-chain interactions are too complex for most people, making it less user-friendly for ordinary users.
**What are the advantages of traditional banks?**
This is where it gets interesting. Government-backed credit, mature regulatory systems—these forms of public trust cannot be easily replicated by DeFi in the short term. For scenarios involving large sums of money or corporate credit, users still trust traditional banks more.
Additionally, services like credit lending are not yet feasible in DeFi. Traditional banks, based on offline scenarios and multi-source data credit evaluation systems, can meet diverse needs such as unsecured small loans and business loans. DeFi, on the other hand, mainly relies on over-collateralized loans, which have a much narrower scope.
Offline branches and comprehensive customer service systems also cover user groups who are less familiar with digital technology. DeFi cannot quickly fill this gap.
Therefore, rather than competing, it’s better to see them as complementary. DeFi innovates financial methods, while traditional banks learn and adapt. Ultimately, the future will likely be a fusion of both. What are your thoughts?