In the crypto ecosystem, what determines how far a project can go is often not how beautifully the technical documentation is written, but whether the economic model is cleverly designed. Take the storage network project Walrus as an example; its token $WAL is like a set of precise gear systems, with each link tightly interlocked, forming a self-consistent closed loop where the interests of all participants are aligned.



Simply put, many people understand $WAL as just a means to "pay for storage fees," but in reality, it serves much more than that. The token carries three completely different functional layers.

First, the **Utility Layer**—the most straightforward part. When users need to store data or retrieve files, they must spend $WAL to purchase these services. The greater the demand, the more tokens are consumed. This "burning" mechanism creates an inherent buying pressure for the token.

Next is the **Security Layer**. Want to become a storage node and earn rewards by participating in network operations? You need to stake $WAL as an "entry ticket." This mechanism serves multiple purposes: locking up circulating tokens to reduce price volatility; the amount staked determines the node's influence and reward share, incentivizing long-term commitment; and the interests of nodes and the network are deeply intertwined, ensuring no one sabotages their own stake.

Then there's the **Governance Layer**. WAL holders can vote on core protocol parameters—how storage fees are set, how new tokens are released, how the incentive pool is allocated... This transforms into a form of ownership certificate, endowing the token with investment attributes.

These three layers are interconnected. Users' storage demands drive token consumption → nodes stake tokens to maintain the network → governance rights benefit long-term holders. Once this flywheel starts spinning, it creates a self-reinforcing ecological feedback loop. That’s why many storage projects can maintain relatively stable token values—because demand, security, and rights are truly unified.
WAL6,54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 01-14 01:56
Wow, now I see how to design tokens properly—it's not just about simple and rough cuts. These three layers of logic are tightly interconnected, and no one can escape. Truly brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 01-13 00:12
Damn, someone finally explained WAL clearly. I used to think it was just a storage coin. This three-layer design is indeed interesting, especially the staking part that really locks up liquidity. But to be fair, the premise is having real storage needs; otherwise, no matter how perfect the model is, it's just theoretical. How long the Walrus flywheel can keep spinning depends on the actual user base; right now, it's still a question mark. With WAL's price so volatile, how come the staking mechanism can't stay stable?
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetectivevip
· 01-12 06:01
Wow, this is what real token design looks like, not those purely money-grabbing schemes.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 01-11 07:56
Details are nailed down tightly, no wonder Walrus can establish a foothold. --- Once the economic model is designed well, it becomes invincible; technology is secondary. --- The three-layer closed-loop concept is quite brilliant, but few projects can execute it effectively. --- That's correct, but there are very few storage projects that can truly get the flywheel spinning. --- This is why holding WAL long-term is important, not just for trading. --- The analysis of the staking mechanism as a multi-purpose solution is excellent, directly solving the volatility issue. --- Yes, yes, yes, the burning mechanism is the fundamental reason why tokens have value. --- Governance rights are very crucial; otherwise, what's the difference from a worthless token. --- I've heard the flywheel theory a hundred times, but there are indeed few projects that can really get it spinning.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSistervip
· 01-11 07:55
This model design is indeed excellent, with a three-layer system of burn + staking + governance, making it hard to find any flaws.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImpostervip
· 01-11 07:51
Wow, this economic model is indeed quite impressive, thinking more deeply than most projects.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 01-11 07:39
Wow, this economic model design is indeed awesome. The burning mechanism combined with staking and governance voting really ties everyone together on the same boat.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 01-11 07:38
Wow, this three-layer design is truly brilliant, much clearer than most projects.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)