2026-01-11 08:20:21

After exploring the crypto ecosystem, I found that although Dusk isn't the hottest topic, its logic is indeed solid. Whether from a technical route or institutional strategy, the team has always maintained a considerable level of restraint — which is quite rare in an industry full of hype stories.

Most projects boast grand narratives, but few can truly interface with the traditional financial system. Dusk's approach is interesting: instead of weaving elaborate stories, it's more practical to address real financial needs. From this perspective, they've found a more pragmatic path.

DUSK-0,91%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FunGibleTom

· 01-12 16:46

Self-control is indeed scarce, but it depends on whether it can really be implemented later. Being pragmatic without a story can also easily lead to marginalization.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 01-11 16:40

Being grounded and genuine is indeed rare, but it also means there's not much of a story to tell... What to do if the hype can't pick up?

View OriginalReply0

VirtualRichDream

· 01-11 08:50

The word "restraint" is indeed valuable in the crypto world. Most projects are eager to hype everything up to the sky, but Dusk seems to be more level-headed. Honestly, projects that genuinely address traditional financial needs are rare; most are just pie-in-the-sky promises. But with low popularity, there's a risk of being buried. No matter how pragmatic, someone has to know about it, right?

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysAnon

· 01-11 08:50

Hmm, low-key projects are actually more reliable. I buy into this logic.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 01-11 08:44

Restraint in this regard is indeed commendable, but frankly, the low popularity is also for a reason. Retail investors buy into this narrative routine; who would want to listen to you talk about real-world financial interfaces...

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 01-11 08:42

Self-restraint is true skill. Projects that are always dreaming should have shut up long ago. Dusk's approach is quite different; instead of hyping, they focus on doing real work, which is rare. Basically, it's the same logic—only those who can solve real problems will survive in the end. In this day and age, projects that prefer to stay low-key are actually more resilient. How to put it, they feel very solid. Pragmatism > storytelling. This phrase is a must-remember. But low popularity is also a problem. Good projects with no recognition are pointless. I favor counter-mainstream strategies—looking forward to these contrast-type projects.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_This_Is_A_Casino

· 01-11 08:35

Yeah, this approach is indeed different and much more clear-headed than those projects that are just daydreaming all the time. To be honest, there are very few projects that honestly benchmark traditional finance, and Dusk's move is quite interesting. Low popularity is fine; stable growth is the real key, no need to chase those虚的. Restraint is almost an endangered species in the crypto world, so it's rare to see one. It's really just the difference between doing and storytelling; the latter always attracts more attention, but the former is what allows you to survive. This is the kind of project I want to see, not those that just tell stories after raising funds. You're right, solving real needs is much more difficult than just making big promises, but it's also more valuable. Sounds reliable, but it still depends on how well the subsequent execution goes. There are still projects willing to stay low-key, which makes them quite unique in this industry. Pragmatic things are often underestimated; once they are discovered, they will take off.

View OriginalReply0

SadMoneyMeow

· 01-11 08:34

Restraint is indeed scarce, but that also means the heat can't get started. It's a paradox. I still somewhat buy into Dusk's approach; it's much more reliable than those who are dreaming every day. To be honest, traditional financial interfaces are really bottlenecked. They dare to tackle this hard bone, which is somewhat impressive. So the question is, will this pragmatic approach be repeatedly educated by the market, and in the end, still need to tell stories to survive? Is it right to bet on this path by compensating for lack of heat with hardness? The logic is clear, but the crypto circle can't do without narratives. Without heat, how to break the circle? A project that doesn't boast is a bit pitiful in this circle. This is what I like—the worry that being too rational might actually fall behind the market rhythm. Pragmatists always suffer losses unless they really stand out in the end.

View OriginalReply0