Interesting to see how a top exchange listed this token, yet the community consensus pegs it at just 30k. The branding itself sparked quite the debate—the naming choice alone drew plenty of eyebrows. Clearly the market's made its own verdict on valuation, regardless of the exchange's backing.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationKing
· 01-14 05:15
Exchange endorsements can't save this lousy name either; the market is just honest.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDips
· 01-11 10:32
The exchange's halo still can't compare to the market truth; a consensus price of 30k is the most honest evaluation.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 01-11 08:47
What’s the use of exchange endorsements? The community slapped it in the face and directly cut it in half. This is the true aroma law of the market.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 01-11 08:43
What is the use of exchange endorsement? The community has already voted, and a $30k valuation says everything. The name chosen... indeed confuses people.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 01-11 08:27
Exchange endorsements can't withstand the market's tough talk; in front of the 30k consensus, everything is pointless.
Interesting to see how a top exchange listed this token, yet the community consensus pegs it at just 30k. The branding itself sparked quite the debate—the naming choice alone drew plenty of eyebrows. Clearly the market's made its own verdict on valuation, regardless of the exchange's backing.