2026-01-11 08:21:24

A recent interesting phenomenon has emerged on X. According to data, over 7.75 million crypto-related tweets were generated just yesterday, a surge of 1224% month-on-month. This sudden wave of content directly impacted the platform's algorithm, leading to systematic censorship of cryptocurrency topics.

What does this reflect? On one hand, market enthusiasm is indeed high; on the other hand, the proliferation of bot content is damaging the entire discussion ecosystem. Genuine opinions are being drowned out, and user experience is significantly affected.

It seems that platform governance and the signal-to-noise ratio in the crypto community really need someone to step in and manage. If this continues, the space for effective market discussion will become increasingly limited.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LightningWallet

· 01-14 07:34

7.75 million tweets a day? How many bots are there frantically spamming? It cracks me up. The algorithm directly banned encryption topics. Serves them right. If this continues, there's really no way to discuss anything. Robots ruin everything, there's nothing we can do. With the signal-to-noise ratio this bad, how can we find truly valuable insights? X platform needs to get a handle on this issue quickly. If it keeps going like this, it'll just become a trash dump.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 01-13 21:33

7.75 million tweets? How many bots must be partying wildly, and the real people who want to discuss are probably drowned out by now. Algorithm blocking has become a salvation, saving our eyes from being blinded by junk information. The signal-to-noise ratio basically means the market isn't mature yet; once big institutions come in, it will naturally improve. X's platform management capabilities are indeed lacking; it’s time for some reform. After this wave recedes, you'll see who was just swimming naked.

View OriginalReply0

BTCWaveRider

· 01-11 17:59

7.75 million tweets are posted in a day. How many robots are frantically spamming? That's hilarious. The genuine voices have already been drowned out. Now, scrolling through the feed is full of spam, so what's the point of talking about coins? If this continues, no one on X will be able to have a proper discussion. It will all rely on algorithmic recommendations and trending topics. Robot governance really needs to be prioritized; otherwise, the ecosystem will be ruined.

View OriginalReply0

PrivateKeyParanoia

· 01-11 08:49

7.75 million tweets a day? This is basically a bot army flooding the feed, and the real valuable voices have already been buried. With such rampant bot activity, X's algorithm governance really needs to wake up. The signal-to-noise ratio is exploding. Now, finding genuine discussions on Twitter is just a matter of luck. That's why I trust small group discussions more; big platforms are already hopeless. Blocking encrypted topics? I think blocking bots is the right way to go.

View OriginalReply0

ChainComedian

· 01-11 08:45

7.75 million tweets increase by 1224% in just one day? How many bots does that take? It’s hilarious to me. I really find robot spam annoying. If you have something to say, just say it properly, everyone. Blocking crypto topics is a really clever move. The platform’s operation is a bit funny, isn’t it? Does no one manage these marketing accounts? Genuine discussions are completely drowned out. The signal-to-noise ratio is maxed out. X’s ecosystem should have been cleaned up a long time ago. With so much junk content every day, how are we supposed to chat?

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 01-11 08:44

7.75 million tweets a day? That's hilarious. The robot farms must be full. Blocking is the right move. Genuine voices can't come through at all. The issue of signal-to-noise ratio should have been addressed long ago. Now, discussions are drowned out by spam content. Another day of bots running rampant. I just want to see some real content for discussion. This 1224% growth... how many scripts would it take to support that? Ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

ApeDegen

· 01-11 08:37

7.75 million tweets in a day just to reach this... Are they really just bots spamming wildly? The signal-to-noise ratio has collapsed, so what’s there to discuss? Blocking is also an extreme measure; instead of solving the problem, they just stay silent. If the platform keeps going like this, genuine voices will be completely gone. This is ecological suicide, a bunch of trash drowning out the truth.

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 01-11 08:34

7.75 million tweets? Haha, that's why I never reveal my holdings on public chains... On-chain analysis is already hard to see clearly, and platforms still want to govern? That's hilarious. --- With bots flooding so aggressively, it was high time to isolate risks with multi-signature wallets. In an era of exploding signal-to-noise ratio, protecting your private keys is the key. --- Systematic blocking? This wave of algorithm adjustments just happens to filter out genuine players; retail investors have already been weeded out. Hold your chips tight; meaningful discussion should be scarce. --- 1224% growth... Value investors should start setting up cross-chain bridges right now. The more chaotic the market, the clearer it is who is truly working hard. --- Honestly, this wave of noise is actually good for contract audits. The risk factor can be directly seen to identify who is serious and who is just gambling. --- No wonder the growth rate of wallet addresses has slowed recently; they are all drowned in bots. Platforms should learn how to do on-chain social verification. --- 7.75 million tweets? I calculated the on-chain data, and the real signal might be less than 5%. Long-term holders simply wouldn't be making frantic posts at this time.

View OriginalReply0