2026-01-11 08:21:35

A Layer 1 blockchain project worth关注: Xenea

The blockchain industry has一直在优化性能和去中心化的平衡，但有个问题长期被忽视——存储。

Most L1 projects focus on transaction throughput and execution efficiency, but few delve into solving the fundamental issue of on-chain data storage. This is precisely where Xenea aims to突破.

The project采用了差异化的技术路线，把存储层作为核心设计之一，试图在扩展性和数据可访问性之间找到新的平衡点。从架构角度看，这是个有趣的思路。

What do you think? Can this storage-oriented L1 become the next wave of infrastructure热点?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationSurvivor

· 01-14 05:11

The storage layer has indeed been neglected for too long, but the problem is that everyone is competing on performance metrics. Who really cares about how the data is stored? Honestly, I haven't heard of Xenea, but the idea is indeed fresh. I'm just worried it might be all talk and no action. Storage hotspots? Dream on. Funds are still chasing projects with high TPS. Let's wait and see if it can really get off the ground. Having ideas alone is useless. The key is the ecosystem. No matter how well the storage is done, if there are no dApps to use it, it's all pointless.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagrant

· 01-13 19:54

Storage is indeed often overlooked, but can it truly solve the pain points, or is it just another PPT project?

View OriginalReply0

HappyToBeDumped

· 01-12 15:49

Storage has indeed been overlooked; everyone is focused on TPS and gas... but when it actually runs, who cares about storage costs? Xenea's approach is pretty good, just worried it might be all talk. --- Hmm... optimizing the storage layer sounds very professional, but after asking a few developers around, no one really cares. --- Next hot topic? Let’s see how stable the mainnet is first; there have been quite a few L1 projects that failed. --- Wait, are their storage solutions sharded or what? Looks a bit like Arweave’s approach? --- Honestly, marketing for projects like this often gets more attention than technological breakthroughs. If Xenea can break into the mainstream, that’s already a win. --- Storage and scalability again, sounds pretty vague... can it produce a killer app? --- I’d like to see how the economic model is designed; who bears the storage costs?

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 01-11 08:51

Storage has indeed been neglected for too long... but the reality is that most users don't care about this, as long as gas is cheap and transactions are fast. --- Xenea's idea is good, but whether it can truly be implemented is another matter. Let's see the execution first. --- To be honest, the storage layer is indeed a pain point. I'm just worried it might be another good theory that fails to be implemented... --- A differentiated approach sounds glamorous, but these kinds of infrastructure projects are very risky. It's a gamble on whether the ecosystem can take off. --- Storage-oriented L1? Let me see the data first before we talk. I don't want to be cut again by a "revolutionary" plan.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerMiner

· 01-11 08:51

Storage has indeed been neglected for too long, but having ideas is not enough; the key is whether they can be truly implemented. By the way, does Xenea have a specific economic model? It seems that projects like this often fail due to incentive mechanisms. It feels like another "solve real problems" narrative. Let's wait and see the mainnet data before making judgments. Optimizing the storage layer is a good direction, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT project... how many can actually be used in practice? They talk about innovative architecture every day, but in the end, it's just following Solana's model, nothing special.

View OriginalReply0

CafeMinor

· 01-11 08:50

Storage has indeed been neglected for too long, but it seems that whether Xenea can truly break through depends on actual results. There are too many storytelling projects. Another point: Talking about elegant architecture alone is useless; we need to see if the ecosystem can keep up. Currently, there are many L1 projects. Why choose this one? Yet another: The idea of the storage layer is good, but I'm worried it might just be another example of advanced technology failing in commercialization. And: Wait, can storage-oriented L1 really reduce costs, or is it just another way to cut the leeks? Last one: Honestly, I don't have a strong impression of Xenea, but this angle is quite fresh. It's worth following up.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainGriller

· 01-11 08:43

The fact that the storage layer has been overlooked really hits the point. TPS has been hyped for so long, but it’s only treating the symptoms, not the root cause. By the way, how did Xenea’s architecture get implemented? Can it truly solve the node operation and maintenance cost issues? It feels like the next wave of the market will be infrastructure, but it depends on who can really make the economic model work. Storage infrastructure? Sounds good, but it depends on how it performs after the mainnet goes live. I just want to know if node storage will once again become dominated by mining hardware providers...

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-11 08:33

Storage has indeed been somewhat neglected; everyone is focused on TPS and gas fees, and no one is really thinking about how data is stored. The idea behind Xenea is quite interesting. If it can truly reduce storage costs, the many projects in the later chain games will be able to operate much more comfortably.

View OriginalReply0