2026-01-11 08:31:41

Looks like the White House has had a change of heart on affordability concerns. What was once dismissed is now back on the policy agenda—a telling shift as economic pressures continue to reshape priorities.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GigaBrainAnon

· 01-14 05:29

The White House's recent moves are quite interesting... Things that were previously dismissed are now being hurriedly revisited. Economic pressure really can change people.

View OriginalReply0

GhostChainLoyalist

· 01-13 20:50

This move by the White House... is so realistic. Say no and they just won't, then when the pressure mounts, they have to take it back. A typical politician's tactic.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-11 09:01

Here we go again. You promised not to care no matter what, but now you're pretending to be very concerned? As soon as the wind shifts, you change your tune.

View OriginalReply0

SorryRugPulled

· 01-11 08:54

I should have known it would go wrong. Politicians are like this—once the wind shifts, they immediately change their strategy. Truly impressive.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 01-11 08:46

The policy direction suddenly shifted, and the previously stubborn stance was pulled out again... Where is the promised position? As soon as economic pressure hits, they change their tune. This routine is already worn out.

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 01-11 08:46

Honestly, once the policy direction shifted, they started paying attention. Why didn't they think of this earlier...

View OriginalReply0

FalseProfitProphet

· 01-11 08:43

The White House's wavering attitude... saying they don't care, then pretending to care now. They really are willing to change everything just for votes.

View OriginalReply0