During times of panic selling in the market, financial institutions in various countries are quietly increasing their positions. This scene feels all too familiar.
Looking back at history, from 1950 to 1982, ordinary people were completely shut out of gold — they couldn’t buy it, nor could they trade privately. Gold has never been a product of free markets; essentially, it’s a national-level chip. If you hoard too much gold, it can easily cause trouble.
And now? Central banks around the world are doing the same — continuously, quietly, and over the long term, adding to their holdings. Essentially, they are re-pricing credit. Once the accumulation reaches a critical point, prices won’t move gradually; a sudden jump is possible. For example, suddenly rising to $15,000 an ounce.
At that point, the game rules become clear: it’s not that you’re not allowed to buy, but that you simply can’t afford to. The channels for increasing holdings will be naturally closed off, and precious metals will revert to being "assets on the national balance sheet." This isn’t the first time this has happened in history. Many people always think this time will be different, but it usually isn’t.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfMadeRuggee
· 01-13 22:41
Wow, isn't this the financial version of cutting leeks... We're always trapped on the outside.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguy
· 01-13 09:17
Here we go again? The central banks are secretly hoarding gold, waiting for us to FOMO and take the bait.
Historical copycat really hasn't changed, and this time is no exception.
It just makes me angry when I think about it; ordinary people are always the last to know.
By the time gold hits $15,000 an ounce, we won't be able to afford it anymore haha.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 01-11 09:51
Basically, it's just another round of the "harvesting" game; retail investors will never get the timing right.
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 01-11 09:49
Everyone is secretly hoarding, retail investors are still cutting losses. This trick really never changes in a hundred years.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 01-11 09:39
Here we go again with this routine? The central bank secretly hoarding gold, retail investors trapped outside watching the show, this script is indeed all too familiar.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 01-11 09:38
Damn, it's still the same old trick. The central banks are flooding the market while bottom fishing, and us retail investors are just panic selling... Truly unbelievable.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketLightning
· 01-11 09:38
It's the same old trick... the central banks are quietly making huge profits there.
During times of panic selling in the market, financial institutions in various countries are quietly increasing their positions. This scene feels all too familiar.
Looking back at history, from 1950 to 1982, ordinary people were completely shut out of gold — they couldn’t buy it, nor could they trade privately. Gold has never been a product of free markets; essentially, it’s a national-level chip. If you hoard too much gold, it can easily cause trouble.
And now? Central banks around the world are doing the same — continuously, quietly, and over the long term, adding to their holdings. Essentially, they are re-pricing credit. Once the accumulation reaches a critical point, prices won’t move gradually; a sudden jump is possible. For example, suddenly rising to $15,000 an ounce.
At that point, the game rules become clear: it’s not that you’re not allowed to buy, but that you simply can’t afford to. The channels for increasing holdings will be naturally closed off, and precious metals will revert to being "assets on the national balance sheet." This isn’t the first time this has happened in history. Many people always think this time will be different, but it usually isn’t.