2026-01-11 09:24:28

Looking at the development of the BSC ecosystem over the years, I truly feel that there are issues with community building. The project teams speak nicely, promising whatever the community wants, but what is the result? Most of the promises are not fulfilled, and instead, retail investors who follow the trend are the ones who get caught the worst. Such situations are common on BSC—when the project is promoting hype, community participation is high, but when it comes to delivering benefits, they start making all kinds of excuses to shirk responsibility. Over time, this will seriously erode community confidence. Effective community governance is not about verbal promises but requires transparent execution mechanisms and genuine profit sharing. Otherwise, no matter how hot BSC gets, the community foundation will be hard to stabilize.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FreeMinter

· 01-14 06:49

One by one being exploited, the project team’s usual rhetoric is really getting old. BSC has been everywhere for a long time, and it’s all just air. Where are the promised commitments? Why did they run away again? Retail investors are probably the biggest victims in the end. Community building? Laughable, it’s all just pie in the sky. Who believes in transparent execution mechanisms? It’s all talk. No matter how hot the trend gets, it can’t save the integrity of these projects. They just want to deceive us into participating with verbal promises—dream on. Profit sharing only exists in their PPTs. True decentralized communities? There are hardly any in BSC.

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 01-13 23:51

To be honest, this is the most heartbreaking part of BSC right now—making a bunch of promises but delivering nothing. Retail investors believe every time, get cut every time. When will they finally learn their lesson?

View OriginalReply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 01-13 18:22

I told you, the technical signals indicating a loss of confidence in the BSC community have been appearing for a while. The MACD death cross has occurred multiple times. The commitment fulfillment rate has been declining from its high point, which is a classic head and shoulders top pattern... Retail investors are still trying to catch the bottom, unaware that the support level has already been broken.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 01-11 09:54

To be honest, I've seen too many of these BSC schemes. Just having a pretty PPT, what's the use? In the end, they all stand people up. Promises are made loudly, but when it’s time to deliver, everyone’s gone. Retail investors always get the last hit. That’s why I’m now skeptical of BSC projects; anyone can say empty words. Transparent mechanisms? Profit sharing? Haha, on BSC, it’s basically a joke. They boast the most before the project runs away. I’ve memorized this pattern. Instead of just blowing hot air here, why not put real money into community dividends? That’s when I’d believe. The current problem with BSC is that it’s too easy to cut the leeks; management can’t keep up.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 01-11 09:49

ngl the promise-to-execution gap on BSC is basically a price deviation waiting to happen... liquidity dynamics all wrong when trust evaporates like that

Reply0

pvt_key_collector

· 01-11 09:47

That's right, I've seen this BSC routine many times; promises are as reliable as farting, and retail investors end up as the bagholders. --- Instead of talking about governance transparency every day, it's better to directly show on-chain data; that's more convincing. --- I've long seen through it; the project teams just want to raise money first, and who cares about the community's fate. --- Yeah, it's always like this. Right after fundraising, the updates become sparse. It's really f***ing ironic. --- Exactly, many projects on BSC are like this, no wonder no one trusts them anymore. --- The problem is still the lack of a real constraint mechanism. Without penalties, who dares to run away? --- I just want to know if these project teams can sleep peacefully. After scamming, they just block, it's absolutely ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-11 09:46

well, *actually* if you look at the smart contract design patterns here, the fundamental issue isn't community management—it's the complete absence of formal verification in tokenomics. most bsc projects never even run their contracts through static analysis tools. empirically speaking, this is why we keep seeing the same rug patterns repeat.

Reply0

LayerHopper

· 01-11 09:42

Basically, it's just a scam, I've seen it all before... project teams make empty promises, retail investors take the bait, and in the end, everyone loses money. --- This false prosperity on BSC has long been exposed; the promises are as reliable as farting. --- It's the same old story... the community is just used to be exploited, who still truly believes in transparent governance? --- It's always the same. Once the hype dies down, project teams go dark. Does anyone still believe in these anymore? --- Really, retail investors should wake up after being scammed once. Don't jump in again; there are too many painful lessons. --- Reliable projects have long moved to other ecosystems; BSC is now just a place for these scammers to harvest leeks.

View OriginalReply0