This project has a good background, with an experienced technical leader on the team, making it quite reliable overall. As for why we chose to participate in this kind of old project, there are actually considerations behind it. New projects may have great potential, but their risk factor is too high, with fast pace and information asymmetry, making retail investors easily exploited. Conversely, projects that have been tested by the market and survived may have limited growth but are relatively more stable and controllable. Trading is like that—sometimes choosing assets with more controllable risks can actually help you survive longer.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SudoRm-RfWallet/
· 17h ago
The old project is indeed stable, but if you ask me, a reliable team ≠ the coin will definitely go up. That logic still has some issues.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 01-13 17:37
Really, old projects are like this; only the tough ones survive. As for new coins with all those flashy features, just forget about them.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToaster
· 01-13 14:42
Living a long life is much more satisfying than getting rich overnight, there's no denying that.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 01-11 09:51
The old project is indeed stable, but the price increase can't be pushed up. Let's see who can withstand the boredom.
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemist
· 01-11 09:40
yeah but the real alpha isn't in picking legacy projects, it's in identifying which ones have actual protocol inefficiencies left to exploit. most "stable" picks are just crowded trades at this point tbh
Reply0
AirdropGrandpa
· 01-11 09:33
Bro is right, a steady approach indeed lasts longer. I also learned this the hard way after losing out on new projects.
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 01-11 09:30
⚠️ hold up, "experienced tech lead" doesn't mean squat if the contracts haven't been audited. seen this pattern 47 times already.
This project has a good background, with an experienced technical leader on the team, making it quite reliable overall. As for why we chose to participate in this kind of old project, there are actually considerations behind it. New projects may have great potential, but their risk factor is too high, with fast pace and information asymmetry, making retail investors easily exploited. Conversely, projects that have been tested by the market and survived may have limited growth but are relatively more stable and controllable. Trading is like that—sometimes choosing assets with more controllable risks can actually help you survive longer.