2026-01-11 09:27:48

BSC has indeed shown signs of recovery recently, with the market becoming more active. Old projects that have survived the bear market are worth paying attention to — being able to withstand the winter indicates two things: first, the community has strong cohesion; second, the team is reliable, not just pure hype.

From a practical perspective, these types of coins tend to have stronger resilience. Compared to high-risk new projects, those with a historical background are more stable in terms of liquidity and consensus.

The current sector sentiment is warming, and this is exactly when coins with "activity + community foundation" are more likely to perform. Many institutional investors also prefer these targets — after all, projects that have stood the test of time have clearer risk profiles.

I am also tracking a few old coin projects that fit this characteristic. If the timing is right, this rebound can be partially benefited from. The key is to recognize the true nature of the project and not be blinded by short-term fluctuations.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OldLeekConfession

· 01-13 17:42

Old coins that survive the bear market really have some skills; the community's stickiness is genuine, unlike new projects that run after a quick pump. However, it's still important to discern and not let emotions carry you away. Being cautious is never wrong.

View OriginalReply0

shadowy_supercoder

· 01-11 20:50

Living projects are indeed different, but don't be fooled by "historical heritage." I've seen many zombie coins pretending to be active. The risk is even greater where institutions gather; retail investors following the trend are most likely to get cut. To put it simply, it's still about observing the team's recent movements. No action means a dead coin.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-11 09:57

That's true, surviving a bear market is definitely different, but it still depends on who is managing it. Some old projects are just lying in a pile of dead ones.

View OriginalReply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 01-11 09:57

Old coins are indeed resilient; surviving the bear market is no easy feat. --- That's right, just worry about stepping into the wrong project; you need to look more at on-chain data. --- I'm also laying low with a few of these rebounds; the key is not to be greedy. --- Projects with strong community engagement are indeed more reliable; they are much more trustworthy than pure concept plays. --- Are institutions also bottom-fishing old coins? Then I need to accelerate my entry. --- Projects that have withstood tests are clearly less risky; they are stronger than a bunch of unknown new coins. --- But still, be cautious; some "old coins" have already cooled off long ago, don't get carried away by emotions. --- The activity on BSC is indeed lively, but choosing the wrong one can send you back to square one; be cautious. --- Liquidity stability is indeed important; otherwise, pulling the market can easily cause losses. --- I'm also looking for such assets; just worried about catching the top, as timing is crucial.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-11 09:56

lmao "this time is different" energy... we literally said this exact same thing in 2017 before the crash. survivorship bias is a hell of a drug fr

Reply0

SellTheBounce

· 01-11 09:39

Sell on rebound; this principle has been explained so many times, yet some still don't understand. Wait, there will be even lower points.

View OriginalReply0

TokenRationEater

· 01-11 09:31

Old coins that survive the bear market are indeed different, but frankly, I've seen too many projects with "strong community engagement" that ultimately go to zero. Don't overhype them.

View OriginalReply0