Why does traditional bond settlement have to be T+2? Frankly, it's not a technical bottleneck, but the three steps of reconciliation, risk control, and compliance that are unavoidable. You first need to confirm the funds are in place, then confirm the securities are in place, and finally verify both parties' identities and compliance. Going through each step sequentially, it can't be fast.
Dusk's approach is interesting. It handles these three steps in parallel, all integrated into zero-knowledge proofs:
The securities party uploads the position Merkle root to the off-chain custodian bank; the buyer maps euros into Dusk's native stablecoin D-EUR, bundled in batches via ZK-Rollup; nodes simultaneously verify three things — "Buyer has sufficient D-EUR"
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSqueezer
· 01-13 21:29
Haha, ZK proof's parallel verification looks impressive, but whether it can be practically implemented depends on how the compliance folks handle it.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 01-12 07:32
The bank's procedures are really rigid and outdated, insisting on following each step sequentially. Dusk's parallel verification approach is indeed impressive, but the question is, when it comes to implementation?
View OriginalReply0
LightningHarvester
· 01-11 09:53
Yes, this approach is indeed feasible, enabling parallel processing of the flash sale serial process.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 01-11 09:52
Another ZK proof system, sounds great in theory but how will it actually be implemented? Probably just another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuru
· 01-11 09:32
This ZK-Rollup parallel processing approach, simply put, is about turning serial into parallel. However, whether it can sustain this speed on the chain depends on the actual throughput of the nodes.
Why does traditional bond settlement have to be T+2? Frankly, it's not a technical bottleneck, but the three steps of reconciliation, risk control, and compliance that are unavoidable. You first need to confirm the funds are in place, then confirm the securities are in place, and finally verify both parties' identities and compliance. Going through each step sequentially, it can't be fast.
Dusk's approach is interesting. It handles these three steps in parallel, all integrated into zero-knowledge proofs:
The securities party uploads the position Merkle root to the off-chain custodian bank; the buyer maps euros into Dusk's native stablecoin D-EUR, bundled in batches via ZK-Rollup; nodes simultaneously verify three things — "Buyer has sufficient D-EUR"