#空投奖励 Seeing that Huma's airdrop Part 2 has started, I have to pour some cold water. This tactic of splitting the airdrop into two rounds is essentially about extending user engagement—those who missed out on the first round will come back, and even those who already claimed will revisit Part 2. Frequent interactions are ultimately just for making the data look good.

The key point is that line: "Airdrop allocation for LP users who have transferred or withdrawn locked PST and mPST will be correspondingly reduced"—this is a typical lock-up trap. On the surface, it seems to attract you with airdrop rewards to provide liquidity, but in reality, it sets up a withdrawal penalty mechanism. Once you move your locked assets, your returns are directly discounted, forcing you to either stay trapped or suffer losses to withdraw.

The deadline of January 26 is also very critical; it's a classic tactic—creating urgency to make people rush decisions. Many people, under this countdown pressure, jump in without carefully calculating actual returns.

My simple advice: first, figure out the real value of the airdrop tokens, compare the project team, funding situation, and liquidity depth, then see if the lock-up costs and opportunity costs are worth it. Don’t be fooled by the "free airdrop"; in the end, you’re the one losing your principal. To survive longer on the chain, always question every seemingly favorable condition.