2026-01-11 09:48:29

Recently, I noticed an interesting trend — major social platforms are also starting to venture into the crypto finance space. It is reported that the platform is planning to launch its own trading wallet feature. What does this mean?

Honestly, this trend reflects that Web3 applications are increasingly entering the mainstream. From the perspective of social media, having a large active user base, if social and trading scenarios can be integrated, user retention will definitely improve. For the cryptocurrency trading and wallet ecosystem, this also signifies the entry of a new player.

Currently, mainstream exchanges and wallet products are already quite mature. New entrants need to find a differentiated position to establish themselves. The advantage of social platforms lies in their user volume and scenario integration, while the disadvantage is that it takes time to refine the trading experience and security mechanisms.

However, this trend of cross-industry entry is very worth paying attention to — it indicates that crypto finance is gradually moving from niche to mainstream, with various internet companies eager to share a piece of the pie. The next step is to see how functional and secure this wallet product truly is, in order to assess its real impact on the existing market landscape.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchroedingerGas

· 01-14 09:04

Wow, another troublemaker is here. Now the exchange is going to panic, haha.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-13 14:03

In simple terms, having a large user base does not necessarily mean a good trading experience, and there is a misconception here that needs clarification. The DAU of social platforms is indeed impressive, but from the source code level, the underlying architecture of financial trading and content distribution are completely different logics. Forcibly integrating them can easily become security vulnerabilities. Let's look at the data—existing leading exchanges have gone through multiple iterations to stabilize, and it is basically unrealistic for new entrants to surpass them in security. Caution is still necessary here. Are you really willing to take such a big risk? Not afraid of a crash. Connecting social and trading platforms sounds good in theory, but the actual operational complexity is seriously underestimated. Regulatory aspects are also a big pitfall. An interesting discovery is that major internet companies now want to replicate Alipay’s path, but the financial attributes of Web3 are inherently in conflict with the traditional internet ecosystem. Whether true integration is possible remains to be further verified. Instead of expecting it to revolutionize the market, it’s better to first see if the infrastructure can be stabilized. Frankly, this is more about a battle for scene traffic; it cannot change the underlying logic.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-13 12:03

It should be pointed out that this guy's analysis is too superficial. According to the logic at the white paper level, entering the wallet business on social platforms is essentially fiat currency thinking—user volume ≠ value consensus, these are two different things. On-chain data shows that true Web3 user stickiness comes from the protocol itself, not the UI aesthetics. Social platform players often make the same mistake... By the way, I am curious to see how they handle the philosophical issues of self-custody wallets.

View OriginalReply0

ShamedApeSeller

· 01-11 10:18

Another big company wants a piece of the pie. To put it simply, it's still a business based on user traffic. The biggest concern for social platforms developing wallets is security. If something goes wrong, users will be devastated. The major exchanges in the mainstream crypto space are already highly competitive. Can these new players survive? It looks lively, but in reality, it all depends on how the product performs once launched. Talking too much now is just pointless. Isn't this a sign that Web3 is moving toward the mainstream? It shows that our thing is really about to become popular.

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 01-11 10:10

Another big company wants to jump in, but let's see if they can really do security well.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMistaker

· 01-11 10:02

Here comes the money again. Is it reliable to sell wallets on social platforms? --- Basically, they just want to retain users. Nothing new. --- Security concerns are worrying. Larger platforms actually pose greater risks. --- This wave indeed indicates mainstream adoption, but it feels like just a passing trend? --- Having more users is useless if the experience and security don't keep up. --- Uh... social platforms making wallets? I still trust professional exchanges more. --- Now it's really entering the public eye, which is a bit exciting. --- Let's see if they can really differentiate themselves, or they'll just be cannon fodder. --- Mainstream adoption is the trend, but can this company break through? It's a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

EntryPositionAnalyst

· 01-11 09:53

Here we go again, a new trick on social platforms to harvest users' funds. We don't expect much from the user experience; let's see if the security mechanisms can hold up.

View OriginalReply0