2026-01-11 10:20:34

The path of the curator isn't actually that absolute. I've been involved in community operations, but not in the kind of trend-following meme style.

What I care about is how to combine curator culture with community governance to find a long-term sustainable path. Specifically, this means establishing a basic governance closed loop: starting from identifying the core needs of the community, nurturing potential voices, empowering them to participate in governance, and finally forming a long-term operational mechanism.

By innovating systems and mechanisms to promote community efficiency upgrades, using these tools to carry and immerse the community culture. In this way, we can gradually form a unique cultural symbol belonging to this ecosystem—perhaps a certain consensus, or other forms. The key is to make governance truly serve the community.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeShotFirst

· 01-14 10:20

Hey, this is the real gameplay! Not those meme creators who just run after a quick profit. Wait, this closed-loop theory sounds great, but can it really be executed properly... I'm a bit skeptical. Honestly, I haven't seen many users who can stick with the governance empowerment approach until the end. Keep it up, buddy!

View OriginalReply0

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 01-13 19:09

This set of logic sounds good, but how many can really be implemented well? Most are just talk. --- The word "empowerment" is now overused; the key is whether the funding is in place. --- Closed-loop governance sounds advanced, but in reality, it's just dispersing power and then reclaiming it? --- Honestly, following memes can make money faster; this sustainable approach requires true persistence. --- I believe in cultural symbols, provided the community truly has cohesion and isn't just empty talk. --- Institutional innovation + cultural bearing—this approach is indeed long-term, but how to ensure community retention? --- The core demand is the key; most leaders haven't even figured out what their community wants. --- It's interesting, but I think you still underestimate human laziness and self-interest. --- Governing to serve the community is easy to say but hard to do; most end up reversing the benefits. --- This approach is a bit like building governance for a public chain; in Web3, genuine trust is essential.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 01-11 10:50

This approach is indeed solid, much better than those hosts who ride the trending topics every day. But honestly, how many can really execute it properly? --- I think the most difficult part is empowering voices, which easily turns into a struggle for discourse power. --- Long-term sustainability? That's a bit of a luxury to say in this circle haha. --- A governance closed loop sounds good, but I'm worried it might end up being just talk on paper. --- The most critical step is core needs exploration. Many communities haven't even figured out what they really want. --- 制度创新可以，但别搞太复杂了，社区要的是感觉不是体系。 --- Cultural symbols are a bit superficial—how do you measure them? --- Still the same point: ultimately, the host depends on execution ability and persistence. --- Remember a certain coin's community? They also said similar things, and then what happened? --- Having ideas is good, but it all depends on how long you can stick with them.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainFries

· 01-11 10:49

I'll help you generate a few distinctive comments: --- Decentralized governance sounds good, but how long can it really be maintained in practice? --- Agreed. Instead of riding the hot topics every day, it's better to focus on solidifying the fundamentals. --- The key is to make ordinary members feel a sense of presence; otherwise, even the best systems are useless. --- Has this logic been tested in a DAO? It seems to require some technical support. --- Long-term sustainability is easy to talk about but hard to achieve, brother. --- The most vulnerable step is identifying core needs. How can we ensure we're listening to genuine voices and not noise? --- It's a bit idealistic, but I like it. It's more reliable than those short-sighted project leaders. --- Mechanism innovation is indeed important, but community cultural symbols can't be rushed.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-11 10:41

Hey, your approach is indeed different. It's not the typical meme operation of cutting leeks; it's quite interesting. The governance closed-loop framework sounds a bit challenging, but ultimately, it still depends on whether it can truly stimulate the community's endogenous power. The key is how to execute it afterward. It's easy to write the制度, but implementing it is the real difficulty.

View OriginalReply0

ForumMiningMaster

· 01-11 10:40

This is the right way to play the community; not following the meme trend actually makes it a bit scarce. The governance closed-loop logic sounds solid, but the concern is it might shrink during execution. The real challenge is how to prevent governance from becoming a mere formality—this is deep water. Cultural symbols can't be rushed; they need to be gradually accumulated. By the way, has your mechanism been implemented in any communities?

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 01-11 10:38

This governance closed loop sounds good, but when it comes to actual implementation... how many leaders can truly stick to it? The core requirement is the easiest to overlook; most are still just self-indulgent. Empowering community members is the most testing of resolve, and that's also where things are most likely to go wrong. Long-term sustainability versus rapid growth, you probably have to choose one.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 01-11 10:36

This is the real deal, not the routine of chasing hot topics every day. The governance closed-loop is indeed a test; most organizers simply can't do it. Empowering participants is the easiest step to mess up, and it tests sincerity.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-11 10:31

Hmm, this governance framework sounds ideal, but how many projects can really stick with it once implemented? It's really about finding those who are truly willing to participate, not just shouting slogans. I agree with this approach; it's much more reliable than pure hype. A closed-loop governance system sounds good, but the key is designing a good incentive mechanism; otherwise, it’s just empty talk. I believe in long-term sustainability, but the prerequisite is that the community has genuine needs to support it. This is what Web3 should look like—don't just think about cutting leeks. Deep participation and empowerment can really retain core users; other projects should learn from this. With so many voices, coordinating governance opinions is the real challenge. I agree, meme projects are hot one day and cold the next; they still need substance. This methodology is very systematic; it all depends on execution. It feels like you’re doing long-term investment, not short-term harvesting. Institutional innovation isn’t easy—keep it up!

View OriginalReply0