The debate around corporate Bitcoin adoption deserves a broader perspective. Those vocal about companies maintaining Bitcoin reserves shouldn't overlook a fundamental reality: criticism should apply consistently across all organizations. If Bitcoin advocates argue that corporate treasuries lacking BTC exposure miss out on value accumulation, that same logic applies universally. The real question isn't which companies should hold Bitcoin—it's whether the argument for Bitcoin's long-term store-of-value proposition stands on its own merits. When selective criticism emerges based on individual company choices, it reveals more about advocacy bias than actual market dynamics. Rather than questioning why specific firms don't adopt Bitcoin, the conversation should focus on the macro trends, adoption rates, and whether institutional Bitcoin positioning correlates with long-term financial performance.