2026-01-12 19:21:02

Polygon has always been a gold mine for the ecosystem. Looking at the projects built on it, such as those involved in the AGI direction and ambitious funding projects, they are all doing interesting things.

When it comes to open-source AI, many people's opinions are not quite right. People always think that open-source AI fails because the model performance is not good enough, but in fact, the problem is not there at all. Why does open-source AI fail? Simply put, it's a coordination issue.

You see, the models are already there, the Agents are also formed, and various tools are available. The real issue is not the technology itself, but how to effectively coordinate and connect these components.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeLady

· 01-15 14:11

ngl polygon's ecosystem coordination problem hits different than most chains... like yeah the tech stack exists but orchestrating it all? that's where the real gwei gets burned. been watching this play out since before the AGI hype wave honestly

Reply0

GasGasGasBro

· 01-13 11:49

Polygon is indeed quite good, but there are still too few projects in the ecosystem that can really gain momentum. Open-source AI coordination collapsing is real; a group of people are working on their own, and no one is integrating them. That's right, what's lacking now isn't technology but someone who can truly piece these building blocks together.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-12 19:48

Coordination issues indeed hit the pain point, but to be honest, the reasons for the death of the open-source ecosystem are far more than just this.

View OriginalReply0

SighingCashier

· 01-12 19:47

Coordination issues are indeed a sore point, but honestly, the difficulty in coordinating internet projects lies here. Having tools alone is useless. Polygon indeed has many good things, but it's uncertain which ones can survive the next cycle. Open-source AI isn't that simple; at the end of the day, it's still about profit distribution. Don't pretend it's just a technical issue. Wait, what about those funding projects? Are they still alive? The problem of coordination breakdown is spot on. It's not just AI; Web3 is the same. The model performance isn't that great either. Stop pretending.

View OriginalReply0

BtcDailyResearcher

· 01-12 19:47

Coordination issues are really something I hadn't thought of before, and it hits the pain point of open-source AI. No, even the most useful model stacks don't matter much; the key is having people actually use them. Projects on Polygon are indeed doing some interesting things, but how far they can go depends on their staying power. Open-source stuff has always been difficult due to ecosystem collaboration; I really respect this analysis. By the way, is it really that hard to connect all the tools? It feels more like an organizational issue. Polygon's ecosystem still has imagination; it all depends on who can truly seize the opportunity. Models are good enough, but each operates independently; that's why open-source AI is always so hyped up but lacks substance.

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 01-12 19:36

Coordination is the key. You're absolutely right; no matter how many technologies are stacked up, if no one can use them, it's all pointless. The projects on Polygon do have some substance, but the ecosystem integration still needs to be refined. Everyone is talking about open-source AI issues, but there aren't many insights that hit the core. This article is pretty good. Whether the model performs well is secondary; the key is whether it can be connected and run smoothly. The Polygon track is definitely worth paying attention to. Whoever figures out the coordination problem first in the AGI space will win. Honestly, now there are all kinds of tools emerging, but 99% of projects are just reinventing the wheel, without thinking about how to collaborate.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityLurker

· 01-12 19:32

Coordination issues are reasonable to mention, but it still feels a bit idealistic. --- Polygon is indeed powerful, but the ecosystem projects vary in quality. --- The Achilles' heel of open-source AI is integration? That logic is a bit novel. --- To put it simply, it's still about lacking a unified scheduling system; having tools alone isn't enough. --- Wait, are you saying it's an engineering problem rather than an algorithm problem? Thinking seriously. --- How are those AGI projects on Polygon progressing? Are there any reliable ones? --- Coordination problems... this hits the point, but who will be the "coordinator"? --- Isn't that just missing a good middleware layer, connecting scattered modules? --- Open-source AI has always been like this, a bunch of smart people doing their own thing. --- If the model's performance is good enough, it will be popular; what more coordination is needed? This issue is overblown. --- The reliability of projects on Polygon mainly depends on the funding parties; that's the key point.

View OriginalReply0

SellTheBounce

· 01-12 19:24

Coordination issues? Nice words, but isn't it just that the profit distribution hasn't been settled. Human weaknesses are fully exposed in open source. No matter how much gold is in the Polygon ecosystem, it can be replenished after a fall. With the model and Agent in place, it's also taking shape, but wait, who will be responsible for failures? When the technology is in place, it can become even more dangerous, and more people will take over. The seemingly smoothly integrated ecosystem often hides the biggest coordination traps. Historical experience tells me that the more enthusiastic the fundraising, the more you should sell on the rebound. The real problem with open source AI is that no one really wants to achieve true win-win cooperation. The gold in the ecosystem belongs to the ecosystem; I only look at technical indicators and trading prices. There are always lower points; why rush to get on board?

View OriginalReply0