2026-01-12 19:23:02

Transparency and privacy are often viewed as opposites in traditional finance—either fully open or completely concealed. But Dusk Network aims to prove that this is not a binary choice; the key lies in how it is designed.

Its approach is straightforward: not pursuing absolute anonymity, but giving institutions and projects a choice—you can allow others to verify that a transaction indeed occurred and complies with rules, while protecting sensitive business details from exposure. This is especially useful in scenarios like on-chain securities, digital real estate, or compliant DeFi, because data privacy itself is valuable.

The underlying technology uses zero-knowledge proofs. It sounds complex, but essentially it’s "I can prove that something is true without revealing all the details." For enterprises, this means passing regulatory checks without exposing all their secrets.

Unlike patching on Ethereum or Bitcoin, Dusk is a native chain designed from the ground up for privacy transactions and compliant assets. In the short term, it may not seem as popular, but in the long run, this architecture can create a real competitive barrier and attract institutional users. Instead of just hype, whether it can truly support the operation of financial scenarios is the key.

$DUSK in the network is not just a payment tool; it is closely tied to validation and node incentives, with usage directly impacting network value. As the demand for privacy transactions and the digitization of compliant assets advance, the value of $DUSK is driven not by storytelling but by real-world applications. This logic is more convincing than a simple tokenomics model.

DUSK0,54%

ETH0,43%

BTC-0,04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TrustMeBro

· 01-14 14:33

Zero-knowledge proofs should have been properly utilized long ago; Dusk's approach indeed hits the pain point. The true moat isn't in the story, but in whether users stay or leave. No hype, no blackening; the combination of compliance + privacy is indeed rare, and has great potential in the long run. Institutional buy-in is the real hard currency, much more reliable than community hype. This is what we call technology-driven, not the typical "cutting leeks" rhetoric in the crypto circle. I hadn't thought of using zero-knowledge proofs this way before; turns out you can play like this. All the nice words are just empty talk; the key is whether it can really get off the ground. The advantages of native chain design are indeed different; just tweaking and copying to match this is way too low-level.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 01-12 19:51

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed powerful, and finally some chains are serious about doing this.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdviser

· 01-12 19:49

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed elegant, but whether they will be truly implemented depends on whether institutions are willing to accept them.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 01-12 19:47

Zero-knowledge proofs have indeed been somewhat overlooked. From an application-driven perspective, DUSK's ROI logic is more solid than projects that only focus on concepts. Institutional-level demand has not yet been fully unleashed, but once the usage of compliant assets on the chain increases, the computational power rewards for node incentives will directly reflect in the token value. This is not a story-driven narrative; it is the real network activity speaking. The strategic opportunity actually lies in these low-profile moments.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-12 19:41

Zero-knowledge proofs, to put it simply, are probably the perfect excuse for institutions to be lazy. --- Dusk's approach is indeed quite good; compared to those coins that shout about privacy, it's much more reliable. --- Wait, are they saying that enterprises can both be recognized by regulators and hide data? That's a bit too idealistic. --- Native chain design is the key point; later entrants can only make small modifications, which can't compare at all. --- $DUSK's real value lies in its applications, not just the story. I agree with that. --- Institutional-grade users? Sounds good, but when will the market actually respond? --- Regulatory-compliant DeFi is inherently a pseudo-proposition. Can Dusk break through? I'm a bit skeptical. --- Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but they're actually a compromise solution. --- Can this kind of design form a barrier? I don't think so.

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 01-12 19:23

Zero-knowledge proof technology indeed hits the pain points of traditional finance, but very few projects can truly be implemented. I understand Dusk's logic; it's about finding a balance between transparency and privacy, providing institutions with a "selective compliance" solution. But can this really attract major institutions to use it? Or will it be squeezed out by pure privacy chains like Monero or traditional financial systems? The technology of zero-knowledge proofs is not an issue; the key lies in ecosystem development and market education. Currently, there are no particularly compelling application cases; it's all about discussing concepts.

View OriginalReply0