Many people attribute the pain points of DeFi to compliance-related friction, but the issue is not that simple. The real obstacle is actually legal uncertainty.
The reason large capital bypasses on-chain systems is not due to inefficiency, but because the legal foundation is too fragile. When no one can be sure how regulatory attitudes will change or whether counterparties pose risks, even the most advanced technology won't attract large funds.
This is precisely why some projects choose to build from the perspective of licensed institutions. By establishing a clear legal framework, they can actually reassure institutional investors. At this stage, legal clarity is more scarce than operational efficiency.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllInAlice
· 01-15 15:02
In plain terms, big capital is betting on the regulatory environment; no matter how advanced the technology is, it must first pass the legal hurdle.
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWell
· 01-14 13:23
From the perspective of legal framework clarity, it indeed hits the core issue, but to be honest, the set of licensed institutions also depends on the region—completely different between the US and Asia.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 01-12 19:56
That's right, legal clarity has really been underestimated. No matter how good the technology is, it can all disappear with a single regulatory statement.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 01-12 19:55
The point about a clear legal framework is spot on. Big capital is just timid; providing some legal clarity is more effective than any high performance.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 01-12 19:51
That's right, legal certainty is indeed more valuable than the technology itself.
Many people attribute the pain points of DeFi to compliance-related friction, but the issue is not that simple. The real obstacle is actually legal uncertainty.
The reason large capital bypasses on-chain systems is not due to inefficiency, but because the legal foundation is too fragile. When no one can be sure how regulatory attitudes will change or whether counterparties pose risks, even the most advanced technology won't attract large funds.
This is precisely why some projects choose to build from the perspective of licensed institutions. By establishing a clear legal framework, they can actually reassure institutional investors. At this stage, legal clarity is more scarce than operational efficiency.