Here's a risk control detail: before the transfer funds arrive, conduct a risk assessment on the recipient account and keep it in a pending state. Even if an abnormal account is later banned, this can effectively protect the security of the funds.



Users purchasing verified accounts inherently carry compliance risks. But this also reminds exchanges to refine their risk control strategies—not only to handle violations after they occur but also to identify risks at key points in the fund flow. Finding a balance between cracking down on non-compliant behavior and protecting user assets can both curb abuse and reduce platform losses. This gradual risk control upgrade is more meaningful for the long-term healthy development of the industry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOmonstervip
· 01-15 18:55
To be honest, this approach has some merit. Front-end risk control is indeed much more reliable than remedial measures after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKingvip
· 01-15 16:09
Alright, this idea is pretty good. Exchanges are now just armchair strategists; what's the use of banning accounts after the money has been transferred? The real skill is being able to identify the risky accounts at the moment the transaction occurs.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKingvip
· 01-15 13:20
Basically, it's still a money issue. Freezing first and then approving is indeed a tough move... But can exchanges really do that?
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 01-12 20:00
Ha, it's the old topic of pre-transaction risk control again. I wonder when exchanges will be able to implement risk assessment before transfers, rather than regretting after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 01-12 20:00
Selling accounts really needs regulation. Exchanges just ban accounts too slowly; they should stop it before the money even arrives.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 01-12 19:49
This idea has some potential, but to be honest, how many exchanges have actually implemented this process? Most are still just firefighting after the fact.
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeErrorvip
· 01-12 19:48
That's correct. Risk control must be proactive; simply banning accounts after the fact is like locking the barn after the horse has escaped. Issues should be intercepted before the funds arrive to truly ensure safety.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 01-12 19:43
According to on-chain data, I had already guessed this set of pre-authorization risk control logic... The move to the pending status is indeed clever, effectively giving the platform a second reaction window.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)