2026-01-12 19:36:59

Two perspectives worth considering:

1) The Federal Reserve's existence itself warrants serious questioning.

2) Yet the methods being pursued to dismantle it are fundamentally flawed.

Both can hold truth simultaneously. The debate isn't binary—questioning the institution's role doesn't automatically validate every proposed alternative. The crypto market remains highly sensitive to Fed policy shifts, making this discussion particularly relevant for anyone tracking macro trends and asset cycles.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FloorPriceNightmare

· 01-15 18:45

Well said, but as for the plans to dismantle the FED... I think most of them are just assumptions, and there are hardly any workable roadmaps.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 01-14 16:10

Whether the Federal Reserve should exist... Honestly, both sides have some valid points, but right now, a lot of people's solutions are also nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 01-13 06:51

nah but the real question is whether we're even asking the right questions... fed's a hydra, cutting off heads doesn't solve the architecture problem lol

Reply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-12 20:01

Uh... are you still arguing about whether to split Fed? I've already seen some 0x starting addresses quietly withdrawing from US debt positions on the chain, and the fund migration trajectory is crystal clear. The real players have long since voted with their feet.

View OriginalReply0

FortuneTeller42