2026-01-12 19:41:38

Recently, I noticed an update to a project's reward mechanism. I initially thought it was just a routine adjustment, but upon checking the schedule, it was extended all the way to the end of July. It seems they are preparing for a long-term operational battle.

This timing is quite interesting. Currently, the discussion around RWA tokenization continues to rise, but everyone is gradually realizing a truth — this track is no longer about who raises more funds or who has deeper pockets, but about who has a better understanding of RWA and who can build stronger consensus. From this perspective, deep collaboration and long-term planning among projects might actually be the true source of competitiveness. Using a prolonged battle approach to operation seems to be more pragmatic.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeGazer

· 01-13 20:41

End of July? Damn, this guy is really serious, not here to cut leeks RWA is now so competitive, does he not understand that raising more funds is useless? A long-term strategy is actually much smarter than burning money, but the problem is that more than half have already fallen before July.

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 01-12 22:10

Pulling until the end of July? I've seen this trick before, a classic move to cut the chives [thinking] The project team talks about long-term operation, but honestly, they just want to lock in your chips. But to be honest, there are indeed some tricks in the RWA space, but don't be fooled. Deep cooperation talk is just for listening. Consensus is the most虚, it's more reliable to look at technicals and capital flow. 坚持看空，反正我不上车

View OriginalReply0

fren_with_benefits

· 01-12 20:11

End of July? This guy really plans to stick with RWA, not the kind to run after taking a profit. Forget it, I can't understand these long-term plans. I'll just wait and see who drops out first. Long-term operation sounds good, but how many can truly stick with it?

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 01-12 20:10

End of July? Bro, are you planning to play the long game? I bet within five months it will either explode or cool off. Let's see what the on-chain data says. I'm tired of the RWA rhetoric; it still depends on who can truly build consensus, not just fundraising hype. Long-term operation battle? Fine, I've already built my position anyway. Whether I average down or not depends on July's performance. In this track, patience matters more than fundraising amount. I just want to see who can survive without cutting the leeks in the end. Sounds good, but it still depends on the financial reports to verify, otherwise it's all just hype. I agree with the long-term strategy, but the question is, can it survive the winter? The market doesn't wait.

View OriginalReply0

PonziWhisperer

· 01-12 20:09

End of July? With such a long schedule, it seems they really want to play the long game. RWA right now is all about the depth of understanding and consensus; fundraising is already outdated. This guy has figured it out—long-term planning is the key.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-12 20:06

ngl the july timeline extension screams accumulation phase behavior... they're not rushing, they're *positioning*. rwa space finally figured out it's not a sprint lmao

Reply0

MonkeySeeMonkeyDo

· 01-12 20:02

By the end of July, this pace is no joke. A prolonged battle is indeed more sustainable than burning money. In the RWA sector, you really see who’s genuine; those with more funding are actually more prone to failure. Projects with long-term plans are worth paying attention to, much more reliable than those who hype up every day. This is what it looks like to do things seriously.

View OriginalReply0