Is Polymarket's incentive mechanism over-issuing? On-chain data suggests that the situation warrants deep reflection.
Statistics show that only 12% of markets on the platform have a trading volume exceeding $10,000, and only 2% have surpassed the $50,000 mark. In terms of participation, only 11% of users have completed more than 100 trades.
These figures are laid out here, yet Polymarket's valuation fluctuates between $10 billion and $20 billion. Comparing the two, it really makes one scratch their head—can a market ecosystem with such thin liquidity sustain its valuation? Or is the prosperity built on early user incentives essentially a bubble? It warrants a re-evaluation by the market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Hash_Bandit
· 01-15 18:06
nah, those liquidity numbers are giving me pre-2017 altcoin vibes... 12% markets doing real volume? that's basically difficulty adjustment before the actual hashrate kicks in. seen this movie before and it doesn't always have a happy ending tbh
Reply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-14 22:05
It's just hot air built up; once the incentives stop, the true nature will be revealed.
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 01-12 20:21
False fire, we all know it well; without incentives, the enthusiasm disappears as well.
---
Once this data was released, it broke the defense; breaking 2% and surpassing 50,000 is truly remarkable.
---
To put it simply, the whales are playing themselves; a valuation of over 100 billion won't last long.
---
When the incentives dry up and the truth is revealed, right now is just a gamble on retail investors taking the bait.
---
I just want to see how many people can remain without subsidies; then we'll know the real water content.
---
With such thin liquidity, daring to value so aggressively is truly showy.
---
Early adopters who came in to harvest the wool should have left by now; most who are still here are just bagholders.
---
Is a 12% market trading volume normal? It looks a bit suspicious to me.
---
It feels like the prediction market itself is a false demand, coupled with virtual hype and double watering.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-12 20:12
The term "虚火" is used perfectly. Can a 12% market share really be inflated to 20 billion? That's hilarious. Some valuations are just illusions built on incentives.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 01-12 20:02
The term "虚火" is used perfectly. I looked at the data and couldn't help but laugh—100-200 billion valuation supporting this level of liquidity? Divine operation.
Is Polymarket's incentive mechanism over-issuing? On-chain data suggests that the situation warrants deep reflection.
Statistics show that only 12% of markets on the platform have a trading volume exceeding $10,000, and only 2% have surpassed the $50,000 mark. In terms of participation, only 11% of users have completed more than 100 trades.
These figures are laid out here, yet Polymarket's valuation fluctuates between $10 billion and $20 billion. Comparing the two, it really makes one scratch their head—can a market ecosystem with such thin liquidity sustain its valuation? Or is the prosperity built on early user incentives essentially a bubble? It warrants a re-evaluation by the market.