Cosmos Ecosystem Grappling with Major Operational Challenges, Anoma Founder Warns

Christopher Goes, co-founder of Anoma, has raised alarm bells about the structural difficulties facing the Cosmos network. In recent comments, he highlighted a troubling pattern: multiple initiatives within the ecosystem have either halted their operations or fundamentally restructured their focus, signaling broader challenges that extend beyond isolated incidents.

The evidence supporting Goes’ assessment is substantial. Penumbra, once a notable project within the Cosmos sphere, has ceased active development. Osmosis, another key player, has transitioned into a maintenance-focused phase, with its team reallocating resources toward different objectives rather than expanding ecosystem functionality. The departure becomes even more apparent when examining projects like Noble, which has chosen to exit the Cosmos network entirely.

These challenges paint a picture of an ecosystem struggling with fundamental sustainability questions. When multiple projects simultaneously reduce their commitment—whether through shutdown, reallocation, or outright departure—it suggests systemic issues rather than isolated difficulties. The Cosmos ecosystem appears to be experiencing a divergence of interests, where individual projects are prioritizing self-preservation over collective ecosystem growth.

The implications for Cosmos stakeholders are significant. A fragmented ecosystem where key builders are retreating or redirecting efforts tends to lose momentum in user adoption and developer attraction. This pattern, if it continues unchecked, could further accelerate the challenges already visible across the network’s interconnected projects.