2026-01-12 20:20:47

Walrus is in the final stage, and cross-chain players' profit ceiling is much higher than single-chain operations. Where exactly is the difference?

The basic routine is easy to get started with. First, complete standard tasks in the Sui wallet, then the key step—use cross-chain bridges to transfer assets to Ethereum or Solana, participate in DeFi transactions, mint NFTs, and finally store data back into the Walrus ecosystem. This round-trip operation can directly earn a 25% weight bonus. Each new public chain connected increases the weight by another 10%, showing a clear tiered incentive design.

How to operate steadily? Rhythm is very important. Scheduling 1-2 cross-chain transfers per week is enough; frequent arbitrage can easily attract risk control attention. When choosing chains, prioritize TVL size—the more mature the protocol, the better the liquidity. Use stablecoins for interactions to significantly reduce the risk caused by price volatility.

This logic is about leveraging the richness of multi-chain interaction data to earn higher weight scores. Ordinary players stick to single-chain tasks for basic rewards, but if you're willing to spend time understanding the cross-chain ecosystem, the profit potential is fully unlocked. In Walrus's final sprint, whoever masters the rhythm of multi-chain collaboration will have a more substantial airdrop quota.

WAL1,7%

SUI-1,75%

ETH0,57%

SOL-1,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredStaker

· 01-15 09:39

Haha, finally someone has explained this clearly. I was wondering why my weight has been increasing so slowly.

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter

· 01-14 10:42

It's the same old multi-chain money-grabbing trick. Risk control has been watching us for two months and still hasn't let us go.

View OriginalReply0

FreeMinter

· 01-12 20:48

Wow, is the cross-chain weight bonus this powerful? It seems like I need to start messing around with it.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 01-12 20:48

The cross-chain stablecoin system is indeed quite effective, much better than just lying flat on a single chain.

View OriginalReply0

MetaEggplant

· 01-12 20:47

Wait, can stablecoin interactions really avoid risk control? I feel like this logic is a bit too idealized.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-12 20:47

It's the same old multi-chain arbitrage trick again. The 25% bonus sounds good, but the gas fees can eat up half of it. Interacting with stablecoins is indeed effective, but guys, don't be too greedy. Frequent cross-chain transfers are a suicidal move. Walrus is already in a red ocean. Those who should have jumped on it early already did.

View OriginalReply0

TokenSleuth

· 01-12 20:38

The stablecoin cross-chain setup is indeed competitive, with 1-2 times a week avoiding attention. You need to master this rhythm thoroughly.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSherlockGirl

· 01-12 20:25

According to my analysis, this logic is actually just a weight harvesting machine. Cross-chain arbitrage with a 25% bonus, plus a 10% new chain bonus... Oh my, someone is already secretly hoarding data. The idea of transferring 1-2 times a week is good, but I bet five dollars that big players are already testing the risk control red line. Using stablecoins to reduce risk earns a perfect score from me. Really, it's much smarter than those YOLO single-chain approaches... But this also means that in the end, the airdrop might not be that substantial? The truth about Walrus's sprint phase might be that the group capable of multi-chain operations took away 80% of the airdrop quota.

View OriginalReply0