2026-01-12 20:24:50

Before delving into AI or other coding techniques, it might be wiser to consolidate your trading fundamentals first—especially considering that the ambition has been there since last year.

Why? Because we are often tempted by glamorous influencer narratives about "financial freedom through trading" to the point of sacrificing formal learning plans. In reality, consistency and discipline in the market take years to truly internalize.

One year is not enough to master market psychology, risk management, and proper execution. Meanwhile, adding focus with new skills like AI or advanced coding could divert energy from core competencies that still need refinement.

A more solid strategy: prioritize trading fundamentals until you are truly confident, then expand into other complementary skills. That’s a more sustainable way to build genuine crypto trading expertise.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkThisDAO

· 01-15 15:36

A year is really not enough in trading, don't let the speed of learning become an excuse to skip fundamentals.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandsCriminal

· 01-14 16:41

Sigh... I wanted to start trading a year ago, and now I'm still learning AI? That's just how I am.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-12 20:55

This guy is right, you really need to first build a solid foundation, or else it will just be a typical case of learning Western techniques without understanding Eastern principles.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-12 20:54

Based on on-chain data, a one-year trading cycle is simply not enough to achieve a 95% confidence level in risk management capabilities. However, the reverse logic also holds true — the incentive incompatibility problem in DAO governance also stems from this, as impatient participants often overlook infrastructure development. It is worth noting that this is actually a classic case of multiple solutions in a game equilibrium.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurnerSociety

· 01-12 20:54

Damn, isn't this talking about me... I've been falling into traps for a year Chasing hot topics and learning AI? First, learn to cut losses This article is basically criticizing professional retail investors like me Watching others make money every day, then turning around and losing everything The core competitiveness is being able to steadily lose all your principal, everything else is just clouds

View OriginalReply0

CommunitySlacker

· 01-12 20:47

Really, don't be fooled by those glamorous trading stories, I've fallen into those traps myself.

View OriginalReply0