Why MSTR avoids publishing that BTC-per-share figure? Because it creates a misleading narrative. Common shareholders don't actually own those bitcoins—that's the critical part people miss. In a liquidation event, you're sitting at the bottom of the capital stack. Secured creditors, bondholders, preferred shareholders all get paid before you see a dime. The company holds the BTC, but your equity claim is vastly junior to asset claims. Yet plenty of analysts in the crypto space openly calculate and share this metric anyway, treating it as if common equity holders have direct ownership exposure. It's a dangerous simplification that conflates corporate holdings with shareholder ownership rights. Understanding this distinction matters when evaluating the real risk-return profile.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NewPumpamentals
· 01-15 20:32
ngl, this is the honest truth. Retail investors are really confused by this per share number.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-15 15:04
Haha, finally someone dares to tell the truth. Those analysts who calculate BTC per share are really just playing with numbers.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 01-14 02:38
Wow, someone finally explained this clearly. I was also puzzled before, wondering why these analysts keep hyping BTC per share. Turns out they were switching concepts.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 01-12 21:02
Let's talk about the MSTR pitch, it's really clever... Ordinary shareholders don't directly hold those BTC, but analysts forcefully create a "BTC per share" metric to trap retail investors. During liquidation, you'll be stuck holding the bag at the bottom, while senior creditors laugh last. The project team knows this well and doesn't release this data, but we get cut up so comfortably.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 01-12 21:01
Wow, finally someone has exposed this situation. Common shareholders are just being used as pawns.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrain
· 01-12 21:01
Ha, this is exactly the point I've been wanting to expose: common shareholders don't have direct ownership, and they are last in line during liquidation.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 01-12 20:54
Now this hits the sore spot. A bunch of people only calculate the per-share BTC quota, completely ignoring the matter of liquidation order...🤦
Why MSTR avoids publishing that BTC-per-share figure? Because it creates a misleading narrative. Common shareholders don't actually own those bitcoins—that's the critical part people miss. In a liquidation event, you're sitting at the bottom of the capital stack. Secured creditors, bondholders, preferred shareholders all get paid before you see a dime. The company holds the BTC, but your equity claim is vastly junior to asset claims. Yet plenty of analysts in the crypto space openly calculate and share this metric anyway, treating it as if common equity holders have direct ownership exposure. It's a dangerous simplification that conflates corporate holdings with shareholder ownership rights. Understanding this distinction matters when evaluating the real risk-return profile.