2026-01-12 20:33:23

The idea of developing a new asset custody solution on L2 ecosystems like Base: it can support daily trading liquidity needs without the hassle of frequent cold wallet operations. The key is to add intelligent protection mechanisms at the security layer—once abnormal access is detected, the funds can be immediately locked, preventing hackers from transferring assets even if they breach the outer layer.

The core logic of this architecture is to balance usability and security: retain the convenience of hot wallets while minimizing risk through multi-layer verification and dynamic risk control. Would love to hear everyone's thoughts on this high-value asset management方案。

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasDevourer

· 01-15 20:20

Hmm... The logic sounds good, but how does it work in practice? Once multi-layer verification gets stuck, do we have to tinker around for half a day again? Basically, it's about finding a balance between liquidity and security. It sounds simple, but in reality, it's full of pitfalls. Is the anomaly detection mechanism reliable? Could it misjudge and lock you out? There’s already a similar solution on Base, so what’s the difference? Cold wallets are just about peace of mind. Spending more brainpower isn’t as good as directly diversifying risk. In my opinion, whether this kind of solution can withstand real large-scale attacks depends on actual combat; theoretical plans are easy to make.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 01-13 06:21

Sounds good, but in reality, the main thing that can block hackers is the execution layer. Smart protection sounds perfect, but it all depends on whether there are vulnerabilities in the code. What are the criteria for judging abnormal access, and how to prevent false positives? Locking too sensitive might freeze your own funds as well. There have been plenty of custodial solutions like this on Base for a long time. The key is user trust... This stuff still relies on audits and track records. Multi-layer verification sounds great, but it can also be annoying. It's all about finding a balance between convenience and security. Cold wallets are so troublesome, why not just use them directly? Why bother with all these fancy tricks?

View OriginalReply0

LowCapGemHunter

· 01-12 21:03

It sounds like they want to find a balance between convenience and security. The idea is good, but the real challenge lies in execution. How can multi-layer verification be implemented without causing lag and affecting transaction speed?

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 01-12 21:01

Listening to this plan, it feels like betting that the logical loopholes in smart contracts will never be fully patched... Can we really lock in the fund flow so straightforwardly? Wait, how is liquidity guaranteed?

View OriginalReply0

LayoffMiner

· 01-12 20:57

Sounds good, but is anomaly detection really reliable? Hackers' anti-espionage skills are also evolving. --- Multi-layer verification sounds nice, but in practice, will it just turn into a bunch of KYC hassle? --- Doing this on Base indeed has potential, but I'm worried it might just be all talk. --- The core issue is who will maintain this protective mechanism—decentralized or controlled by a single team? --- Cold wallets are troublesome, I admit, but hot wallets' convenience often becomes a hotbed of risk. --- Dynamic risk control sounds impressive, but how exactly does the dynamic method work? --- I like this logic; it's much more reliable than those all-or-nothing schemes. --- It sounds good, but the key question is, who dares to put truly large assets into it?

View OriginalReply0

OneBlockAtATime

· 01-12 20:55

Sounds good, but does anyone really use cold wallets since they are so troublesome? I’m too lazy to bother anyway. Multi-factor authentication sounds easy to implement, but in practice, will it work smoothly... The main concern is whether it responds quickly enough. Running this scheme on L2 would be much cheaper, right? Gas fees are what I care about most. How is the anomaly access detection algorithm designed? Could it mistakenly block normal transactions? Honestly, you really only know if it’s reliable after being hacked. But being able to use hot wallets without constantly worrying is a good balance to find.

View OriginalReply0